PERTH MARKETS LTD

Case [2019] WASC 417


JURISDICTION     :   SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

IN CIVIL

CITATION:   PERTH MARKETS LTD [2019] WASC 417

CORAM:   HILL J

HEARD:   23 AUGUST & 26 SEPTEMBER 2019

DELIVERED          :   23 AUGUST & 26 SEPTEMBER 2019

PUBLISHED           :   15 NOVEMBER 2019

FILE NO/S:   COR 164 of 2019

MATTER:   PERTH MARKETS LTD

EX PARTE

PERTH MARKETS LTD

Plaintiff

FILE NO/S:   CIV 2416 of 2019

MATTER:   ONE FUNDS MANAGEMENT LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE PERTH MARKETS LAND TRUST

BETWEEN:   ONE FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED AS TRUSTEE FOR THE PERTH MARKETS LAND TRUST

Applicant


Catchwords:

Corporations law - Scheme of arrangement - Application for orders convening scheme meeting under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Whether requirements to order scheme meeting are satisfied - Orders made convening meeting

Corporations - Application for directions by trustee under s 92 of the Trustee Act 1962 (WA) - Whether within jurisdiction to make the directions sought - Approach to be taken to trust scheme - Whether proposed amendments are within the powers of alteration conferred by the constitution of the trust - Whether trustee required to serve application on all unitholders

Corporations law - Scheme of arrangement - Application for orders approving the scheme under s 411(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Orders made approving scheme - Reservation of liberty to apply

Corporations - Application for directions by trustee under s 92 of the Trustees Act 1962 (WA) - Second court hearing - Relevant considerations

Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (WA), s 411, 413
Trustees Act 1962 (WA), s 92(1), 92(2)
Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA), O 58 r 4
Supreme Court (Corporations) (WA) Rules 2004 (WA)
Property Law Act 1959 (WA)

Result:

Orders made convening scheme meeting and giving directions sought
Orders made approving scheme and giving directions sought

Category:    B

Representation:

COR 164 of 2019

Counsel:

Plaintiff : Mr A J Papamatheos

Solicitors:

Plaintiff : Lavan

CIV 2416 of 2019

Counsel:

Applicant : Mr A J Papamatheos

Solicitors:

Applicant : Lavan

Case(s) referred to in decision(s):

Decimal Software Limited; in the matter of Decimal Software Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 2040

In the matter of Ardent Leisure Limited (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1990

In the matter of Investa Funds Management Limited (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1995

Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2008] HCA 42; (2008) 237 CLR 66

Plan B Trustees Ltd v Parker [2012] WASC 392

Psivida Ltd v New Psivida, Inc; Re Psivida Ltd [2008] FCA 627

Re Abacus Funds Management Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1309; (2006) 24 ACLC 211

Re Amcom Telecommunications Ltd [2015] FCA 341

Re APN News and Media Ltd [2007] FCA 770; (2007) 62 ACSR 400

Re Ardent Leisure Lted [2018] NSWSC 1665

Re Auzex Resources Ltd (No 2) [2012] QSC 101

Re Avoca Resources Ltd [2011] FCA 208

Re Cortona Resources Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 302

Re CSR Ltd [2010] FCAFC 34

Continue reading PERTH MARKETS LTD

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
PERTH MARKETS LTD [2019] WASC 417
Case
[2019] WASC 417
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Perth Markets Limited was a party in a legal dispute that was heard by the Supreme Court of Western Australia. The primary issue was whether the requirements for convening a scheme meeting under section 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) were satisfied. Additionally, the court was asked to consider whether it had the jurisdiction to provide the directions sought by the trustee under section 92 of the Trustee Act 1962 (WA). The trustee sought directions to amend the trust scheme, and the court had to determine if the proposed amendments were within the powers of alteration conferred by the trust's constitution. Furthermore, the court was required to decide if the trustee was required to serve the application on all unitholders.

The court first examined whether the requirements for convening a scheme meeting were met. It concluded that the application satisfied the criteria, and thus, it ordered the convening of the scheme meeting. Regarding the jurisdiction to make the directions sought by the trustee, the court determined that it had the necessary jurisdiction under section 92 of the Trustee Act 1962 (WA). The court then addressed the proposed amendments to the trust scheme, finding that they were within the powers of alteration conferred by the trust's constitution. Finally, the court decided that the trustee was not required to serve the application on all unitholders.

Following its findings, the court made orders approving the scheme and reserving the liberty to apply. The court also provided the trustee with the directions sought under section 92 of the Trustee Act 1962 (WA), taking into account the relevant considerations in making those directions. This comprehensive approach ensured that all aspects of the trust scheme and the scheme of arrangement were adequately addressed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.