JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
IN CHAMBERS
CITATION: PERPETUAL TRUSTEES WA LTD -v- MACFARLANE [2009] WASC 61
CORAM: MASTER SANDERSON
HEARD: 25 FEBRUARY 2009
DELIVERED : 24 MARCH 2009
FILE NO/S: CIV 1491 of 2007
BETWEEN: PERPETUAL TRUSTEES WA LTD as trustee for WILLIAM THOMAS WOOD
Plaintiff
AND
IAN RUSS MACFARLANE
JULIE MAY GILL
THOMAS KEITH MACFARLANE
First DefendantsSHEILA MARY COOPER
BARBARA LESLEY BRACKEN
Second DefendantsHECTOR THOMAS WOOD as executor of the estate of HORACE CHARLES WOOD (dec)
BARRY JAMES WOOD,
NEIL WILLIAM WOOD and
MARGARET ANNE SEABROOK as executors of the estate of THORNTON JAMES WOOD (dec)
Third Defendants
Catchwords:
Wills - Application by trustee as to the proper interpretation of the will of deceased - Turns on own facts
Legislation:
Nil
Result:
Will interpreted
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
Plaintiff: Mr P J Mugliston
First Defendants : Mr G R Hancy & Dr J J Hockley
First-named Second Defendant : No appearance
Second-named Second Defendant : Dr P R McMillan
Third Defendants : No appearance
Solicitors:
Plaintiff: Kott Gunning
First Defendants : Lavan Legal
First-named Second Defendant : No appearance
Second-named Second Defendant : Marks & Sands
Third Defendants : No appearance
Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):
Hornsby v Playoust [2004] VSC 472
Lutheran Church of Australia South Australia District Inc v Farmers Co‑operative Executors & Trustee Ltd (1970) 121 CLR 628
Perrin v Morgan [1943] 1 All ER 187
MASTER SANDERSON: This case concerns the interpretation of a will, probate of which was granted in September 1937. The question of the proper interpretation of the will has been before the court before. The order made subsequent to the hearing before Dwyer CJ was dated 25 March 1938. This will probably be the last time the proper meaning of the deceased's will is in issue.
The plaintiff applies pursuant to s 92 of the Trustees Act 1962 (WA) for directions from the court in relation to the interpretation of the will of the late William Thomas Wood (the deceased).
Paragraphs 2 and 3 of cl 6 of the deceased's will establish a trust in relation to properties owned by the deceased that are located on the corner of Hay and Pier Streets, Perth (the trust). The plaintiff is a current trustee of the trust.
Paragraphs 2 and 3 of cl 6 of the deceased's will read as follows:
My property at the corner of Hay and Pier Streets six (6) shops my wife and four daughters to draw equal shares and should anyone of them die their share to go to the surviving three and so on until all the rents to be divided every month between them in equal shares but sufficient to be paid into the Bank to pay all rates and taxes and repairs
Not on any account is anyone of them to borrow any money on their share nor to sell nor to mortgage their share or their right but should there be any children of their own alive at…
Continue reading Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd v Macfarlane
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd v Macfarlane [2009] WASC 61
- Case
- [2009] WASC 61
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue that the court had to determine was the proper interpretation of specific provisions of the will. The provisions in question were ambiguous and open to differing interpretations. The court needed to decide which interpretation best reflected the deceased's intentions. This required an analysis of the language used in the will, as well as any relevant extrinsic evidence that could shed light on the deceased's intentions.
In reaching its decision, the court carefully considered the language of the will, along with any relevant extrinsic evidence. The court found that the interpretation proposed by the trustee aligned most closely with the deceased's intentions. The court held that the trustee's interpretation was the correct one, based on the language of the will and the surrounding circumstances. The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the will and a thorough understanding of the deceased's intentions.
The court's interpretation of the will was upheld, and the trustee was directed to administer the estate in accordance with the court's decision. The court's interpretation provided clarity and certainty, ensuring that the deceased's wishes were properly executed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Will interpreted
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.