Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd v Darvell

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

PERPETUAL TRUSTEES WA LTD as Executor of the Estate of HENRY JAMES DARVELL -v- DARVELL & ORS [2001] WASC 123



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2001] WASC 123
Case No:CIV:1448/200014 MARCH 2001
Coram:WHEELER J18/05/01
9Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Questions answered:
1 Yes
2 Unnecessary to answer
3 No
4 Unnecessary to answer
5 Unnecessary to answer
6 Unnecessary to answer
PDF Version
Parties:PERPETUAL TRUSTEES WA LTD as Executor of the Estate of HENRY JAMES DARVELL
MARION FAITH DARVELL
EDITH MARY DARVELL as Executor of the Estate of ANTHONY JOHN DARVELL
DOREEN DAPHNE DARVELL
PATRICIA JUNE SLIGHT

Catchwords:

Equity
Trusts
Application by trustee for directions
Life tenant and remainderman
Maintenance and payment of outgoings
Turns on own facts
Succession
Wills, probate and administration
Construction and effect of testamentary dispositions
No new point of principle

Legislation:

Trustees Act 1962 (WA)

Case References:

Carrodus v Carrodus [1913] VLR 1
Ford v Keenan (1914) 30 NSW WN 214
Gibbons v Gibbons [1920] 1 Ch D 372
Lehman v Haskard, unreported; SCt of NSW; Equity Div; 29 August 1996
Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Godsall [1979] 2 NSWLR 785

Edwards v Edwards (1918) 24 CLR 312
MacLaren v Stainton (1858) 27 LJCh 442
O'Hern v O'Hern, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 7358;10 November 1988
Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (as Executor of the will of Goyder (dec)) v Goyder & Ors, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 990138; 24 March 1999
Re Herklot's Will Trusts [1964] 2 All ER 66
Re Sinnamon (dec) [1940] QWN 41
Re Trusts of the Will of Gilchrist (1867) 6 SCR (NSW) Eq 74
The Trustees Executors & Agency Co Ltd v Jope (1902) 27 VLR 706
Thomas v Haworth (1918) 20 WALR 78
Wilkie v The Equity Trustees Executors & Agency Co Ltd [1909] VLR 277

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CHAMBERS
CITATION : PERPETUAL TRUSTEES WA LTD as Executor of the Estate of HENRY JAMES DARVELL -v- DARVELL & ORS [2001] WASC 123 CORAM : WHEELER J HEARD : 14 MARCH 2001 DELIVERED : 18 MAY 2001 FILE NO/S : CIV 1448 of 2000 BETWEEN : PERPETUAL TRUSTEES WA LTD as Executor of the Estate of HENRY JAMES DARVELL
    Plaintiff

    AND

    MARION FAITH DARVELL
    First Defendant

    EDITH MARY DARVELL as Executor of the Estate of ANTHONY JOHN DARVELL
    Second Defendant

    DOREEN DAPHNE DARVELL
    Third Defendant

    PATRICIA JUNE SLIGHT
    Fourth Defendant



Catchwords:

Equity - Trusts - Application by trustee for directions - Life tenant and remainderman - Maintenance and payment of outgoings - Turns on own facts




(Page 2)


Succession - Wills, probate and administration - Construction and effect of testamentary dispositions

No new point of principle


Legislation:

Trustees Act 1962 (WA)




Result:

Questions answered:


1 Yes
2 Unnecessary to answer
3 No
4 Unnecessary to answer
5 Unnecessary to answer
6 Unnecessary to answer

Representation:


Counsel:


    Plaintiff : Ms M R Bloch
    First Defendant : Mr S M Standing
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd v Darvell and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2001] WASC 123
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd v Darvell [2001] WASC 123 involved the Supreme Court of Western Australia in the context of a dispute over the administration of a trust created by the will of Henry James Darvell. The plaintiff, Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd, as executor of the estate, sought directions regarding the management of the property and the rights of the life tenant, Marion Faith Darvell. The central issue was whether Marion had a life interest in the property at 48 Henry Street, East Cannington, and whether this interest was conditional upon her payment of rates, taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance, and other outgoings.

The court examined the language of the will and considered precedents such as Gibbons v Gibbons and Ford v Keenan to determine the nature of Marion's interest in the property. The court concluded that the will created a life interest in the property for Marion, as indicated by the use of words like "occupy" and "use." The court also found that the requirement for Marion to pay certain outgoings did not impose a condition on the continuation of her life interest, but rather constituted a duty or obligation.

Given that there was no immediate threat to the remaindermen's interests due to the property's state of disrepair and Marion's ability to fulfill her obligations, the court saw no need for the property to be sold or for Marion to be evicted. The court emphasized that any future action would depend on whether Marion failed to meet her obligations. Therefore, the court decided that Marion had a life interest in the property, but her interest was not conditional on her making specific payments, and there was no need to sell the property at that time.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.