Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd

Case

[2021] FWCA 4202

16 JULY 2021

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2021] FWCA 4202
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd
(AG2021/5887)

PERNOD RICARD WINEMAKERS PTY LTD PRODUCTION (BAROSSA VALLEY) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Wine industry

COMMISSIONER YILMAZ

MELBOURNE, 16 JULY 2021

Application for approval of the Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd Production (Barossa Valley) Enterprise Agreement 2021.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd Production (Barossa Valley) Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in ss.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 8 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[4] The United Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 23 July 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE512282  PR731768>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0