FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| PERKINS & MEAKIN | [2017] FCCA 2348 |
| Catchwords: HELD: Date of separation found to be May 2013 – matter adjourned to enable the parties to file written submissions on the question of whether the Applicant should be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss.4AA, 44(6), 90RD |
| Moby & Schulter (2010) FLC 93-447 Jonah v White [2011] FamCA 221 |
| Applicant: | MR PERKINS |
| Respondent: | MS MEAKIN |
| File Number: | MLC 313 of 2017 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Bender |
| Hearing date: | 21 September 2017 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 21 September 2017 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 21 September 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Perkins in person |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Not applicable |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Ms Meakin in person |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Not applicable |
ORDERS
Pursuant to Section 90RD(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) it is declared that the de facto relationship between the Applicant and the Respondent ended in May 2013.
By 4:00pm on 19 October 2017 the Applicant file and serve written submissions in relation to the question of whether he should be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time pursuant to section 44(6) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
By 4:00pm on 16 November 2017 the Respondent file and serve written submissions in relation to the question of whether the Applicant should be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time pursuant to section 44(6) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Perkins & Meakin is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLC 313 of 2017
| MR PERKINS |
Applicant
And
| MS MEAKIN |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from Transcript)
Introduction
These proceedings were initiated by the Applicant de facto Husband by way of Initiating Application filed by him on 13 January 2017 wherein he seeks a division of assets between he and his former de facto Wife.
The Respondent de facto Wife filed her responding material on 26 April 2017. In it, amongst other things, she disputes the date of separation claimed by the Applicant.
The Respondent contends that the parties’ separated in May 2013 when the Applicant moved out of the home in which they had been living together as a couple.
The Applicant submits the relationship between he and the…
Continue reading PERKINS & MEAKIN
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Perkins and Meakin [2017] FCCA 2348
- Case
- [2017] FCCA 2348
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the precise date of separation. If the court found the separation date to be May 2013, as submitted by the respondent, the applicant's initiating application would have been filed more than two years after the relationship's breakdown, necessitating an application for leave to institute property proceedings out of time.
The court found that the de facto relationship ended in May 2013. Consequently, the matter was adjourned to allow both parties to file written submissions addressing whether the applicant should be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time, pursuant to section 44(6) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The applicant was ordered to file submissions by 19 October 2017, and the respondent by 16 November 2017.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Pursuant to Section 90RD(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) it is declared that the de facto relationship between the Applicant and the Respondent ended in May 2013.
2.
By 4:00pm on 19 October 2017 the Applicant file and serve written submissions in relation to the question of whether he should be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time pursuant to section 44(6) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
3.
By 4:00pm on 16 November 2017 the Respondent file and serve written submissions in relation to the question of whether the Applicant should be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time pursuant to section 44(6) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.