Perder Investments Pty Ltd v Elmer
Case
•
[1991] FCA 529
•30 AUGUST 1991
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Perder Investments Pty Ltd v Elmer, M.A.V. [1991] FCA 529 ((1991) 31 FCR 201; (1991) 23 ALD 552)
[1991] FCA 529
30 AUGUST 1991
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Perder Investments Pty Ltd sought judicial review of a decision by the Secretary of the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (Queensland) to refuse an application to transfer its Torres Strait Fisheries Licence. The application for transfer was made after the expiry date of the original licence, which resulted in its cancellation. Perder Investments, as the new applicant, sought to have the refusal to transfer the licence reviewed by the Federal Court.
The primary legal issue was whether the Federal Court should grant relief, despite the original licence having expired prior to the hearing of the review. Perder Investments argued that the Secretary's decision was flawed as it failed to take into account the fact that the original licence had expired. The Court was required to determine if this constituted a sufficient ground for granting relief.
The Court found that the refusal of the application to transfer the licence was not flawed. It held that the Secretary's decision was based on sound legal and factual grounds, which were not challenged by Perder Investments. The Court also concluded that the expiry of the original licence did not affect the validity of the decision to refuse the transfer. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal and made no order as to costs.
The primary legal issue was whether the Federal Court should grant relief, despite the original licence having expired prior to the hearing of the review. Perder Investments argued that the Secretary's decision was flawed as it failed to take into account the fact that the original licence had expired. The Court was required to determine if this constituted a sufficient ground for granting relief.
The Court found that the refusal of the application to transfer the licence was not flawed. It held that the Secretary's decision was based on sound legal and factual grounds, which were not challenged by Perder Investments. The Court also concluded that the expiry of the original licence did not affect the validity of the decision to refuse the transfer. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal and made no order as to costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Standing
-
Limitation Periods
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Perder Investments Pty Ltd v Elmer, M.A.V. [1991] FCA 529 ((1991) 31 FCR 201; (1991) 23 ALD 552)
Most Recent Citation
Ireland v Dunne [2021] FCA 245
Cases Citing This Decision
44
Webber v Racing New South Wales
[2019] NSWSC 46
Webber v Racing New South Wales
[2019] NSWSC 46
AA & Ors v Department of Family and Community Services
[2016] NSWSC 842
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
In The Matter of the Trade Practices Act 1974 as amended (Section 163A) And In The Matter of an Application by Tooth & Co. Ltd
[1978] FCA 19
Martin v Taylor
[2000] FCA 1002
Jess, Michael Patrick v Scott, R.J
[1984] FCA 36