| [2017] FWCA 1986 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Pentair Flow Technologies Pacific Pty Ltd
(AG2017/911)
PENTAIR FLOW TECHNOLOGIES SOUTHERN CROSS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 10 APRIL 2017 |
Application for approval of the Pentair Flow Technologies Southern Cross Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pentair Flow Technologies Southern Cross Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Pentair Flow Technologies Pacific Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 April 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE423952 PR591699>
- AGLC
- Pentair Flow Technologies Pacific Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 1986
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1986
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission examined the application and the agreement in detail. It considered whether the bargaining process was conducted in good faith, the classification and conditions of the employees, and whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and that it properly classified the employees. Additionally, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and that it met all the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission's approval of the agreement was based on its finding that the agreement met all the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement that had been made in good faith and that it provided for the proper classification of employees. Furthermore, the Commission found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and that it met all the requirements for approval. The Commission's decision was final, and the agreement was approved as a valid enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.