Penski and Kocher (No. 2)
[2013] FamCA 392
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| PENSKI & KOCHER (NO. 2) | [2013] FamCA 392 |
| FAMILY LAW – DIVORCE |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Penski |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Kocher |
| FILE NUMBER: | DGC | 2330 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 26 March 2013 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Melbourne |
| PLACE HEARD: | Melbourne |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Cronin J |
| HEARING DATE: | 26 March 2013 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Sweeney |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Hayes & Associates |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Ms Nikou SC with Mr Mort |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Nicholes Family Lawyers |
Orders
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Penski & Kocher (No. 2) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
FILE NUMBER: DGC 2330 of 2010
| Ms Penski |
Applicant
And
| Mr Kocher |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for divorce filed by leave this day. Counsel for the wife, who is not present, has indicated she consents to the abridgement of times necessary for the matter to be filed and for it to proceed forthwith. The wife does not dispute any of the facts set out in the application which she had seen.
I am satisfied as to jurisdiction. The application is based on the fact that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. I am satisfied that that ground has been established. The parties have been separated for more than a year, and that there is no likelihood of a resumption of that relationship.
In respect of s 55A of the Act, there is one child of the marriage, R, who was born in March 2008, (“the child”). I am satisfied that, for the purposes of section 55A, proper arrangements in all of the circumstances have been made for the care, welfare and development of the child.
I grant an order for divorce which will become final in one month. I declare, for the purposes of s 55A, that the only child is the child R and that proper arrangements have been made for his welfare. I also abridge all times for the matter to proceed forthwith and waive all service requirements.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Cronin delivered on 26 March 2013.
Associate:
Date: 22 April 2013
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Consent
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0