Peninsula Transit Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWCA 3163


[2015] FWCA 3163
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Peninsula Transit Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2486)

PENINSULA TRANSIT P/L ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 7 MAY 2015

Application for approval of the Peninsula Transit P/L Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Peninsula Transit Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Peninsula Transit P/L Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (the ‘Union’) and is to cover 153 employees who are engaged as bus and coach drivers providing services based in Seaford and Hastings, Victoria. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 12 March 2014, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 4 December 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a vote for the Agreement’s approval, 125 of the 128 employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 22 April 2015. While I note that this is outside the statutory time period set out in s 185(3)(a) of the Act, I consider it fair in all the circumstances to extend the date for lodgement to 22 April 2015 (s 185(3)(b)).

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr R Hamilton, General Manager, Operations identified the Passenger Vehicles Transportation Award 2010 [MA000063] and the Transport Workers (Passenger Vehicles) Award 2002 [AP818060] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Hamiltonsaid that the Agreement provides for a number of conditions that are in excess of, or are more beneficial than the terms of the relevant reference instruments and that there are no less beneficial terms. The Agreement provides for higher base rates of pay and a serious of continuous service grants. Base rates of pay are to be adjusted on 1 January and 1 July during the nominal term of the Agreement by reference to percentage changes between average weekly earnings in the preceding May to November and November to May, respectively. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 18 and 19 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 12 erroneously refers to Fair Work Australia, which I take as providing for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 5 May 2015, Mr C Broadbent, Solicitorappeared for the applicant and Ms S Manos for the Union. Mr Broadbent outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He offered undertakings clarifying rates of pay for Casual School Bus Supervisors, the shift allowance for work performed after 10:00pm and the operation of the adjustments to base rates of pay. Ms Manos supported the submissions of Mr Broadbent and indicated that the Union did not object to these undertakings. Pursuant to s 191(1) of the Act, these undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. A copy of these undertakings is attached to the Agreement and marked as ‘Annexure A’. The Union had filed a Declaration in relation to the application (Form 18) supporting the approval of the Agreement and giving notice that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement (s 183). For the purposes of s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Union is to be covered by the Agreement.

[5] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Peninsula Transit P/L Enterprise Agreement 2014. Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 12 May 2015 and have a nominal expiry date of 31 March 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code {?}, AE413834  PR567139>

Details
AGLC
Peninsula Transit Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 3163
Case
[2015] FWCA 3163
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Peninsula Transit Pty Ltd was the subject of an application before the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Peninsula Transit P/L Enterprise Agreement 2014. The applicant, Peninsula Transit Pty Ltd, sought the approval of the proposed agreement which aimed to regulate the terms and conditions of employment for its employees. The application was contested by the Transport Workers Union of Australia, objecting to certain provisions within the agreement.

The primary legal issues the Commission needed to address were whether the agreement complied with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly focusing on whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it was made in good faith. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement appropriately addressed the bargaining obligations under the Act, ensuring that the process followed was fair and transparent.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission carefully examined the provisions of the agreement and the bargaining process undertaken by the parties. The Commission found that the agreement contained terms that were fair and reasonable, and that the process of negotiation was conducted in good faith. Despite some objections raised by the Transport Workers Union of Australia, the Commission determined that the agreement did not contain any provisions that were contrary to the public interest or that failed to meet the statutory requirements. As such, the Commission approved the agreement.

The final orders of the Commission were that the Peninsula Transit P/L Enterprise Agreement 2014 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009, effective from the date of the Commission's decision. The approved agreement would then govern the employment terms and conditions for the employees of Peninsula Transit Pty Ltd.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.