Pelechowski, in the matter of Pelechowski v NSW Land and Housing Commission

Case [2000] FCA 299


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Pelechowski, in the matter of Pelechowski v NSW Land & Housing Commission
[2000] FCA 299

IN THE MATTER OF KARL PELECHOWSKI
KARL PELECHOWSKI v NSW LAND AND HOUSING COMMISSION & ANOR
NI 2875 of 1995

MADGWICK J
8 MARCH 2000
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NI 2875 of 1995

IN THE MATTER OF KARL PELECHOWSKI

BETWEEN:

KARL PELECHOWSKI
APPLICANT

AND:

NSW LAND AND HOUSING COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT

AND:

PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF NSW
SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

MADGWICK J

DATE OF ORDER:

8 MARCH 2000

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.   The application is dismissed.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NI 2875 of 1995

IN THE MATTER OF KARL PELECHOWSKI

BETWEEN:

KARL PELECHOWSKI
APPLICANT

AND:

NSW LAND AND HOUSING COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT

AND:

PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF NSW
SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

MADGWICK J

DATE:

8 MARCH 2000

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(revised from transcript)

HIS HONOUR:

  1. In this matter, on 17 February 2000, it appeared that the applicant, Mr Pelechowski had been made bankrupt. The representative of the Official Trustee was present and it was agreed that Mr Pelechowski had not filed his Statement of Affairs. The Official Trustee very reasonably took the view that this was an embarrassment to the exercise of the election whether to prosecute or discontinue these proceedings contemplated by s 60(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“the Act”). The 28 day period limited for such election by s 60(3) had expired.

  2. After discussion and decision as to the nature of the proceedings and whether they could continue in the bankrupt's own name (I held that they could not), I ordered that the applicant file and serve on the Official Trustee on that day, 17 February, the Statement of Affairs as required under the Act and, conditionally upon compliance with that order, I ordered the time be extended for the Trustee to make his election for 14 days which would have brought the date for election to 2 March 2000. The matter was further listed for directions today for the orderly disposition of the proceedings.

  3. Mr Pelechowski has not appeared today and has not communicated with the Court, as far as I am aware.  Despite his having claimed to an officer of the Official Trustee that he had completed the Statement of Affairs, although late, it has still not been received by the Official Trustee, either formally or informally. 

  4. In the circumstances, the consequences are that the time was not extended and accordingly, pursuant to s 60(3), these proceedings are deemed to have been abandoned by the Trustee.  The appropriate order is that the application be dismissed.  I decline to make an order for costs.

I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick.

Associate:

Dated:             8 March 2000

Counsel for the Respondent:

R Goot

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Toomey Pegg Drevikovsky

Solicitor for the Official Trustee:

M McNally of Lobban McNally & Harney

Date of Hearing:

8 March 2000

Date of Judgment:

8 March 2000

Details
AGLC
Pelechowski, in the matter of Pelechowski v NSW Land and Housing Commission [2000] FCA 299
Case
[2000] FCA 299
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pelechowski applied to the court for an order that the NSW Land and Housing Commission (the Commission) had failed to comply with a direction of the court. The Commission was ordered to transfer to Pelechowski the sum of $40,000 held in a trust account. Pelechowski alleged the Commission had not complied with the order. The Commission argued the transfer had been made, and the money was in Pelechowski's account. The court was required to determine whether the Commission had complied with the order and whether the Commission had a defence to the allegation of non-compliance.

The court found that the Commission had not complied with the order. The Commission had not transferred the money to Pelechowski's account. The Commission argued that the money had been transferred but had been returned by the bank as the account number provided by Pelechowski was incorrect. The court held that the Commission had not proven its defence. The application was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

MADGWICK J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: MADGWICK J

Full text does not contain this section.