Legal Research
Cases
Peachbulk Pty Ltd v R T Edgar Pty Ltd (No 2)

Peachbulk Pty Ltd v R T Edgar Pty Ltd (No 2)

Case [2011] VCC 1465

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Peachbulk Pty Ltd v R T Edgar Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] VCC 1465
Case: [2011] VCC 1465
Decision Date: 20 December 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Peachbulk Pty Ltd v R T Edgar Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] VCC 1465

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd [1988] FCA 364
Citation 1

…against a contemnor … .” [2] (1993) 46 FCR 225 at 233. Reliance was also placed in particular on Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 at 400-401…
Bradbury and Lander (No. 3) [2019] FamCA 152
Citation 2

…ntentions…an imprudent refusal of an offer to compromise…and an award of costs on an indemnity basis against a contemnor … .” [2] (1993) 46 FCR 225 at 233. Reliance was also placed in particular on Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 at 400-401…
Ventouris Enterprises Pty Ltd v Dib Group Pty Ltd (No. 3) [2010] NSWSC 1479
Citation 3 (Para 13)

…ion will ordinarily lead to an order for costs on the usual basis and something more must be established for a special order as to costs.”[6] [6] [2010] NSWSC 1479 at [13]…
Fassbender v HW & MTA Bohlmann [2010] VSCA 204
Citation 4 (Para 71)

…the fifth defendant. 48 A Sanderson order will not ordinarily be made unless: [13] Fassbender v Bohlmann (t/as Seymour Freight Lines and Caravans) [2010] VSCA 204 at [71] (a) the plaintiff’s claims against the two defendants are interdependent; essentially alternative claims; and (b) it is reasonable for the plai…
Macedon Ranges Shire Council v Thompson [2009] VSCA 209
Citation 5

…ly established laws.”[9] [7] [2004] VSCA 123 [8] (1988) 81 ALR 397 [9] [2004] VSCA 123 at [40] see also Macedon Ranges Shire Council v Thompson [2009] VSCA 209…
Piscopo v Not Lawyers [2008] FCA 1907
Citation 6

…5 at 233. Reliance was also placed in particular on Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 at 400-401…
Murdaca v Maisano [2004] VSCA 123
Citation 7

…enced or continued for some ulterior motive or because of some wilful disregard of the known facts or to some clearly established laws.”[9] [7] [2004] VSCA 123 [8] (1988) 81 ALR 397 [9] [2004] VSCA 123 at [40] see also Macedon Ranges Shire Council v Thompson [2009] VSCA 209…
NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 2) [2001] FCA 480
Citation 8 (Para 56)

…or her past conduct, may be relevant to an assessment of his or her conduct as litigant.” [5] NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 11) (2001) 109 FCR 77 at [56]…
Yorke v Lucas [1985] HCA 65
Citation 9

…egations, the purchaser, in final submissions, had accepted Ms Fleetwood as a witness who did her best to recall the events of the auction day. [3] (1985) 158 CLR 661 16 Counsel submitted that the purchasers had failed on a number of grounds against Mr Michael Abay and failed entirely against Ms Fleetwood. 17 Counsel…
Peachbulk Pty Ltd v R T Edgar Pty Ltd [2011] VCC 1370
Citation 10

…1 These reasons need to be read in conjunction with the principal reasons delivered on 20 October 2011.[1] [1] [2011] VCC 1370 2 I heard extensive submissions about costs on 9 November 2011. A number of issues need to be determined.…

AI Chat coming soon