Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: PDS Engineering Division Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2025] NSWLEC 1583 Hearing dates: 3-4 July 2025 Date of orders: 15 August 2025 Decision date: 15 August 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Modification application DA.66/23/2, seeking to modify development consent No. 66/23 for the partial demolition of heritage item and construction of part 4 and part 11 storey mixed use building comprising 8 studio units, 1 x 2 bed, 9 x 3 bed and 16 x 5 bed units for a total of 52 units, 4 levels of basement carparking containing 51 car parking spaces on land at 290 Pacific Highway, Crows Nest is refused.
(3) All Exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, B and C.
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – whether development is substantially the same development – retention of heritage fabric – reasons given for the grant of consent sought to be modified
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4.55, 8.15
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (NSW), s 113
North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, cl 5.10
Cases Cited: Arrage v Inner West Council [2019] NSWLEC 85
Canterbury-Bankstown Council v Realize Architecture Pty Ltd [2024] NSWLEC 31
Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd V North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298; [1999] NSWLEC 280
North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Limited (1998) 43 NSWLR 468; (1998) 43 NSWLR 468
PDS Engineering Division Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2024] NSWLEC 1722
Texts Cited: Australia ICOMOS, The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013
Department of Planning and Environment, Assessing Heritage Significance, 2023
North Sydney Development Control Plan, 2013
Category: Principal judgment Parties: PDS Engineering Division Pty Ltd (Applicant)
North Sydney Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Wright SC / T To (Applicant)
S Burveling (Respondent)
Holding Redlich (Applicant)
Matthews Folbigg (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2025/124288 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: On 8 November 2024, the Court’s decision in PDS Engineering Division Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2024] NSWLEC 1722 (PDS No.1) granted consent to development application No. DA66/23 for the proposes of development involving restoration of a heritage item, partial demolition works, and construction of a 11-storey mixed use building comprising two floors of commercial premises, 52 residential units, and four levels of basement parking, public domain and landscaping works, and other associated works, at Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 1279891, referred to as 286-294 Pacific Highway, Crows Nest (the Original Consent).
-
In general terms, the development proposed the restoration and partial demolition of an existing heritage listed building, construction of a mixed use building with commercial tenancies and residential apartments over, and public domain works and landscaping.
-
Then, as now, an existing two-storey Art Deco style building that was once the site of a shop and…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read PDS Engineering Division Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1583
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties and concluded that the Council had acted within its statutory powers and had considered all relevant matters. The court found that the proposed development would significantly alter the heritage value of the site and that the refusal was a reasonable and lawful exercise of the Council's discretion. The court also noted that the applicant had not adequately demonstrated how the proposed development would mitigate the adverse impacts on the heritage item. As such, the court upheld the Council's decision to refuse the modification application.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Modification application DA.66/23/2, seeking to modify development consent No. 66/23 for the partial demolition of heritage item and construction of part 4 and part 11 storey mixed use building comprising 8 studio units, 1 x 2 bed, 9 x 3 bed and 16 x 5 bed units for a total of 52 units, 4 levels of basement carparking containing 51 car parking spaces on land at 290 Pacific Highway, Crows Nest is refused.
(3) All Exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, B and C.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.