Payne and Kennett and Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 4 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

PAYNE & KENNETT AND ANOR [2017] FamCA 400
FAMILY LAW – COSTS – Child representative – Where all applications before the Court dismissed due to non-appearance of the parties – Where parties ordered to pay the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 117, 117(2), 117(2A), 117(4), 117(5)
Gahen & Gahen No. 2 [2013] FamCA 936
De Roma & De Roma [2013] FamCA 566
APPLICANT: Ms Payne
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ms Kennett
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr Trevor
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Ms Quirk
FILE NUMBER: BRC 4442 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 16 May 2017
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Foster J
HEARING DATE: 16 May 2017

REPRESENTATION

APPLICANT – SELF‑REPRESENTED LITIGANT: No appearance
FIRST RESPONDENT – SELF‑REPRESENTED LITIGANT: No appearance
SECOND RESPONDENT – SELF‑REPRESENTED LITIGANT: No appearance
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Ms Quirk of Crawford Ryan Lawyers Pty Ltd

Orders

  1. All applications before the Court are dismissed.

  2. The proceedings be removed from the active pending cases list.

  3. Within two months of this date the father pay to Legal Aid NSW by way of contribution to the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s costs the sum of $1,622.34.

  4. Within two months of this date the mother pay to Legal Aid NSW by way of contribution to the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s costs the sum of $1,622.34.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Payne & Kennett and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: BRC 4442 of 2014

Ms Payne

Applicant

And

Ms Kennett

First Respondent

And

Mr Trevor

Second Respondent

EX TEMPORE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In this matter there being no appearance by the applicant and respondents, all applications before the Court are dismissed and the proceedings are removed from the pending cases list.

  2. The outstanding application before the Court is the application for costs by the Independent Children's Lawyer.

  3. The parties have now disengaged from these proceedings, and as a consequence of that disengagement and presumably the relocation of the subject child, L to New Zealand pursuant to orders made on 19 July 2016, the parties’ various applications before the Court have been dismissed.

  4. The Independent Children’s Lawyer seeks an order that the parties pay equally the costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer that are assessed in accordance with exhibit “A” in a total of $3,244.67. The Independent Children's Lawyer seeks an order that each of the parties pay the sum of $1,622.34.

  5. The law as to costs is…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Payne and Kennett and Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] FamCA 400
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of *Payne and Kennett and Anor* concerned an application before Foster J. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties, identified as the father, the mother, and an Independent Children's Lawyer, is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that it involved applications before the Court and the assessment of costs.

The primary legal issues before the Court were the determination of the applications made by the parties and the allocation of costs associated with the Independent Children's Lawyer.

Foster J dismissed all applications before the Court and ordered the proceedings be removed from the active pending cases list. The Court further ordered that the father pay $1,622.34 and the mother pay $1,622.34 to Legal Aid NSW as a contribution towards the Independent Children's Lawyer's costs, with both payments to be made within two months of the date of the order.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

All applications before the Court are dismissed.

2.

The proceedings be removed from the active pending cases list.

3.

Within two months of this date the father pay to Legal Aid NSW by way of contribution to the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s costs the sum of $1,622.34.

4.

Within two months of this date the mother pay to Legal Aid NSW by way of contribution to the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s costs the sum of $1,622.34.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.