FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pavlakis v Equmen Pty Limited (No 3) [2014] FCA 1274
Citation: Pavlakis v Equmen Pty Limited (No 3) [2014] FCA 1274 Parties: ANTHONY PAVLAKIS and GAVIN JONES COMMUNICATIONS PTY LIMITED v EQUMEN PTY LIMITED ACN 129 797 315 File number(s): NSD 857 of 2014 Judge(s): YATES J Date of judgment: 6 November 2014 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - application under s 175 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for correction of defendant’s register of members Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 175, 436B, 437C Cases cited: Pavlakis v Equmen Pty Limited [2014] FCA 929
Pavlakis v Equmen Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 951Date of hearing: 6 November 2011 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 13 Solicitor for the First Plaintiff: Benjamin Nicholson Law (Ms K Nicholson appearing) Counsel for the Second Plaintiff: Mr R Marshall Solicitor for the Second Plaintiff: Benjamin Nicholson Law The Defendant: Did not appear Counsel for Mr Levi: Mr R Marshall
Solicitor for Mr Levi: Gillis Delaney Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 857 of 2014
BETWEEN: ANTHONY PAVLAKIS
First PlaintiffGAVIN JONES COMMUNICATIONS PTY LIMITED
Second PlaintiffAND: EQUMEN PTY LIMITED ACN 129 797 315
Defendant
JUDGE:
YATES J
DATE OF ORDER:
6 NOVEMBER 2014
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 175 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) the register of members of the defendant be corrected by:
(a)removing the name of Corie Kim Chung therefrom as the holder of 25 fully‑paid ordinary shares in the defendant; and
(b)recording the second plaintiff to be the holder of 100 fully-paid ordinary shares in the defendant, currently being all the issued fully-paid ordinary shares in the defendant,
with effect from 20 May 2012.
2.Order 4 made on 20 August 2014, be varied nunc pro tunc to read:
“On the plaintiff, by his counsel giving the usual undertaking as to damages, David Levi, an official liquidator, be appointed liquidator of Equmen Pty Limited provisionally, pursuant to s 472(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with power to implement any order made by the Court for the correction of the defendant’s register of members and to do all other acts incidental thereto.”
3.The appointment of David Levi as provisional liquidator of the defendant be terminated as at 3.15 pm on 6 November 2014.
4.The amended originating process filed on 22 October 2014 be dismissed with no order as to costs.
5.Save for the claim in prayer 2 of the interlocutory process filed on 3 October 2014, the interlocutory process be dismissed with no order as to costs.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 857 of 2014
BETWEEN: ANTHONY PAVLAKIS
First PlaintiffGAVIN JONES COMMUNICATIONS PTY LIMITED
Second PlaintiffAND: EQUMEN PTY LIMITED ACN 129 797 315
Defendant
JUDGE:
YATES J
DATE:
28 NOVEMBER…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Pavlakis v Equmen Pty Limited (No 3) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FCA 1274
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the plaintiffs had standing to apply for the correction of the defendant's register of members, and whether the proposed changes to the register were appropriate under section 175 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Additionally, the court needed to consider the appropriateness of the previous orders made concerning the appointment of a provisional liquidator and the termination of that appointment.
The court found that the plaintiffs had standing to apply for the correction of the register of members, and that the proposed changes were justified. The court ordered that the register be corrected to reflect the second plaintiff as the holder of all issued fully-paid ordinary shares in the defendant, and to remove the name of Corie Kim Chung from the register. The court also varied the previous order appointing David Levi as provisional liquidator, terminating his appointment as of a specified date. The amended originating process and the interlocutory process were dismissed, except for the claim in prayer 2 of the interlocutory process. The court's decision was based on the legal principles and statutory provisions relevant to the correction of a company's register of members and the appointment and termination of a provisional liquidator.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 175 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) the register of members of the defendant be corrected by:
(a) removing the name of Corie Kim Chung therefrom as the holder of 25 fully‑paid ordinary shares in the defendant; and
(b) recording the second plaintiff to be the holder of 100 fully-paid ordinary shares in the defendant, currently being all the issued fully-paid ordinary shares in the defendant,
with effect from 20 May 2012.
2. Order 4 made on 20 August 2014, be varied nunc pro tunc to read:
“On the plaintiff, by his counsel giving the usual undertaking as to damages, David Levi, an official liquidator, be appointed liquidator of Equmen Pty Limited provisionally, pursuant to s 472(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with power to implement any order made by the Court for the correction of the defendant’s register of members and to do all other acts incidental thereto.”
3. The appointment of David Levi as provisional liquidator of the defendant be terminated as at 3.15 pm on 6 November 2014.
4. The amended originating process filed on 22 October 2014 be dismissed with no order as to costs.
5. Save for the claim in prayer 2 of the interlocutory process filed on 3 October 2014, the interlocutory process be dismissed with no order as to costs.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.