Pavey & Anor v Struber & Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Pavey & Anor v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 79
PARTIES: Ashley Owen Pavey & Darrell Warren Skennar
(applicants)
v
Stephen Roy Struber & Dianne Rose Wilson-Struber
(respondents)
FILE NOs: MRA1088-16
MRA1089-16

MRA1090-16

DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for grant of mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 14 December 2016
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: Submissions closed 9 December 2016
HEARD AT: On the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith
ORDERS:

1.     In respect of ML 100095 compensation is determined in an amount of $171.00 per annum.

2.     In respect of ML 100086 compensation is determined in an amount of $374.00 per annum.

3.     In respect of ML 100093 compensation is determined in an amount of $187.00 per annum.

4.     The miners pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amounts set out in orders 1, 2 and 3 within three months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and on the anniversary of the grant of each lease.

CATCHWORDS:

MINING LEASE – referral – grant – determination of   compensation – absence of expert or valuation evidence – use of Court judgments for determination purposes – Public Trustee of Queensland

Mineral Resources Act 1989 s 281

Public Trustee Act 1978 Part 7

Fitzgerald & Ors v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76

Kayes v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 3

Northeast Mining Co Pty Ltd v Struber & Anor

[2016] QLC 5

Munro & Anor v Struber & Anor[2016] QLC 49

Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297

APPEARANCES: Not applicable
  1. These proceedings concern a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 281(1) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the grant of Mining Leases  ML 100086, ML 100093 and ML 100095.

Background

  1. The applicants, Ashley Owen Pavey and Darrell Warren Skennar (the miners) seek the grant of mining leases and access upon land described as Lot 14 on SP250040.  This land in more commonly known as Palmerville Station and is owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). 

  2. Palmerville Station is located in the Cook Shire Local Government area and is used for grazing purposes. 

  3. The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows: 

Court Reference Tenure ID  Mining Area Access Area Term Lease Purpose
MRA1088-16 ML 100095 14.86 ha 0.8 ha 12 years Gold – Tin
MRA1089-16 ML 100086 28.49 ha 9.5 ha 10 years Gold – Tin
MRA1090-16 ML 100093 8.853 ha 15.4 ha 10 years Gold – Tin
  1. The landowners are currently serving a period of imprisonment and consequently the referral documents list the address for the respondents as:

    QUEENSLAND PUBLIC TRUSTEE
              PO BOX 656

    CAIRNS QLD 4870

Relevant Legislation

  1. Section 279 of the MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Pavey & Anor v Struber & Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] QLC 79
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pavey and Anor brought an action against Struber and Anor concerning the grant of mining leases and the determination of compensation. The case was heard by the Queensland Land Court. The dispute arose from the grant of mining leases over the plaintiffs' land, and the primary issue was the determination of compensation for the land taken by the leases. The court also considered the absence of expert or valuation evidence and whether it could rely on previous court judgments to determine the compensation amount.

The court considered the nature of compensation for the grant of mining leases under the Mining Act 1978. It also examined the circumstances in which the court could determine compensation in the absence of expert or valuation evidence, particularly in cases where previous judgments had established compensation rates for similar leases. The court noted that it was appropriate to consider previous court decisions as a guide in determining the compensation amount, given the absence of specific evidence in the current case.

The court determined that the compensation for the mining leases should be based on previous judgments, given the lack of expert or valuation evidence. It referred to previous cases to establish a compensation rate for each mining lease. The court found that the compensation for the mining leases should be set at $171.00 per annum for ML 100095, $374.00 per annum for ML 100086, and $187.00 per annum for ML 100093. The court ordered that the compensation be paid to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners within three months of the notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and on the anniversary of the grant of each lease.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 100095 compensation is determined in an amount of $171.00 per annum.

2. In respect of ML 100086 compensation is determined in an amount of $374.00 per annum.

3. In respect of ML 100093 compensation is determined in an amount of $187.00 per annum.

4. The miners pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amounts set out in orders 1, 2 and 3 within three months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and on the anniversary of the grant of each lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.