Pauls Merchants Pty Ltd v Nebco Pty Ltd
[1985] FCA 434
•27 Aug 1985
| m: | NEBCC' FTP LIMITED |
Pefipordent
2 .
| l.b! | c s r ry ln? | on | or | s d v e r t i s l n g the | s?.iJ r e t a i l |
| hardware | st9r.p busine-s | ac | I n I e s t f i e l d ShOpFlnq |
| $:entre, | North Pocks in t he said S ta te lund?r any |
| name which comprises | or Includes rile word |
| " P a u l ' S" ; | and |
| NEECO ?TY LIMITED | - |
Pezpondent
.
3 .
In relation to the balance of convenience. ~t :?ems
| t c me c l e a r that to allcx the respnnrclent to tra?? | Ilnder t:?? |
name "Fauls" is likely to occaslon prcblems f o r the qplicsnt.
both in th? continued condbxt of its Susmess in other
| locations and in the | disposal 2f those busmesses as currently |
pro~ected. It is axiomatic that if members of the publir
assoclate the respondent's premises with the busmess of the
applicant and find themselves dissatisfied with the services
offered. or the range of qoods stocked, by the respondent,
this 1 s llkely CO damage the qoodwill of the spplicant, in
relatlon to its other stores. Furthermore, the sale cf zhe
applicant's other stores, at least under the esistln9 names,
| is likely to be prejudiced bg t h e use by the respondent | of the |
| name "Pluls" in | a manner likely to cause the confusion which I |
| t h 1 P . K | exists in this | , : A Z E . |
4 .
| The n n l g prFju.dire that Plr Gni:for,au | has identifieci |
I?. i11z .il-!bmiszlon 1s the Inconvenience 2nd ccnfas;?n if ?h+
store 1 s now compelled to use a name other than "P3uls" apd.
belng successful at the flnal hearing, is then free t9 rev?rt
to "Pauls". I suppose it is posslble that there would be some
mconvenlence if that chain of events occut's, but it seems to
| me that any inconvenience thus suffered | by the respondent il |
very much of lts own making, and indeed would be a product
only of an eventual decision to revert to the name "Paluls" lf
| it was successful at the final hearlnq. | There iz nu reason in |
| the evidence to belleve that this would | be J. commerclallg |
| 4ttrartlve proposltion except in | the r ~ a y of | d e s l r m ~ | to profit |
by confuelon with the applicant's name.
5.
0
0
0