Paul v Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated Gill v Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated Arnold v Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated Arnold v Southern Cross Care (Tasmania) Incorporated Heath...

[2019] HCASL 45

PAUL

v

SOUTHERN CROSS CARE (TASMANIA) INCORPORATED

GILL

v

SOUTHERN CROSS CARE (TASMANIA) INCORPORATED

ARNOLD

v

SOUTHERN CROSS CARE (TASMANIA) INCORPORATED

ARNOLD

v

SOUTHERN CROSS CARE (TASMANIA) INCORPORATED

HEATH

v

SOUTHERN CROSS CARE (TASMANIA) INCORPORATED
[2019] HCASL 45
H5/2018
H6/2018
H7/2018
H8/2018
H9/2018

1. These applications for special leave to appeal concern the meaning of a statutory provision that is unique to Tasmania and do not give rise to any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania (Blow CJ, Estcourt and Geason JJ).  An appeal to this Court would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal.  The applications should be dismissed.

2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the applications with costs.

M.M Gordon	J.J Edelman
13 March 2019