Paul Sadler Swimland Riverside Gardens Unit Trust Pty Ltd T/A Paul Sadler Swimland Townsville

Case

[2013] FWCA 9468

3 DECEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWCA 9468

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Paul Sadler Swimland Riverside Gardens Unit Trust Pty Ltd T/A Paul Sadler Swimland Townsville
(AG2013/11048)

PAUL SADLER SWIMLAND RIVERSIDE GARDENS UNIT TRUST PTY LTD (TRADING AS - PAUL SADLER SWIMLAND TOWNSVILLE) (ABN: 88941403432) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009

Health and welfare services

COMMISSIONER CRIBB

MELBOURNE, 3 DECEMBER 2013

Application for termination of the Paul Sadler Swimland Riverside Gardens Unit Trust Pty Ltd (Trading As - Paul Sadler Swimland Townsville) (ABN: 88941403432) Enterprise Agreement 2009.

[1] Paul Sadler Swimland Riverside Gardens Unit Trust Pty Ltd T/A Paul Sadler Swimland Townsville (the company) has made an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date. The application has been made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is Paul Sadler Swimland Riverside Gardens Unit Trust Pty Ltd (Trading As - Paul Sadler Swimland Townsville) (ABN: 88941403432) Enterprise Agreement 2009 (the Agreement). The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 September 2012. No employee organisation was covered by the Agreement.

[2] Section 226 of the Act provides that the Commission must terminate an agreement following an application made under section 225 if:

    “(a) FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

    (b) FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

      (i) the views of the employees, each employer and each employee organisation (if any) covered by the agreement; and

      (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[3] Submissions were received from Mr Michael Taylor, Principal Consultant, HMT Consulting, on behalf of the company, dated 9 October 2013 and 1 November 2013. The submissions outlined the background to the application and stated that cancellation of the Agreement would provide an immediate benefit to casual employees. It was also indicated that, until there is approval of a replacement Agreement, employees would receive the higher of either their current hourly rate or the equivalent rate under the Fitness Industry Award 2010.

[4] No submissions that the termination of the Agreement would be contrary to the public interest have been received.

[5] On the basis of the material before me, I am satisfied that the termination of the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest. Further, I have considered the circumstances of the matter and have concluded that termination of the Agreement is appropriate.

[6] Therefore, in accordance with section 226 of the Act, I must terminate the Agreement. The application to terminate the Agreement is approved.

[7] The termination will take effect from today's date, 3 December 2013.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE871440  PR545233>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0