Patwe & Ors v MIMIA

[2005] HCATrans 344

[2005] HCATrans 344

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S201 of 2004

B e t w e e n -

NAZIR AHMED ABDUL RAZAK PATWE

First Applicant

YASMIN NAZIR AHMED PATWE

Second Applicant

HUMA NAZIR AHMED PATWE

Third Applicant

HURAINE NAZIR AHMED PATWE

Fourth Applicant

ARBAAJ NAZIR AHMED PATWE

Fifth Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 26 MAY 2005, AT 9.24 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

__________________

GLEESON CJ:   The first two applicants are husband and wife and the other three applicants are their children.

The Federal Court (Stone J) dismissed an appeal against the dismissal by the Federal Magistrates Court of an application for review of the refusal of Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) Visas for the applicants.

The case turned upon the absence of compliance with the necessary requirement of sponsorship by an Australian business.  That being so, the other grounds presented in the Federal Court did not fall for determination.

There are no prospects of success on an appeal to this Court.  Special leave is refused with costs.

Pursuant to r 41.11.1 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing with costs this application for special leave.

AT 9.25 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED