[2013] FWCA 7259 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Pathways Sailors Bay Pty Ltd
(AG2013/8928)
PATHWAYS AGED CARE SAILORS BAY, NSWNMA & HSU NSW BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Aged care industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Pathways Aged Care Sailors Bay, NSWNMA HSU NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pathways Aged Care Sailors Bay, NSWNMA HSU NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application has been made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Pathways Sailors Bay Pty Ltd. The agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I have considered the matters contained in the employer declaration and the declaration made on behalf of the employee organisation which will be covered by the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied the NSW Nurses and Midwives’ Association, the Australian Nursing Federation- NSW Branch and the Health Services Union NSW Branch are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE404227 PR542266>
- AGLC
- Pathways Sailors Bay Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7259
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7259
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval and whether the provisions in question were consistent with the Act. The central issue was whether the provisions of the agreement, which related to the definition of "employee", were inconsistent with the Act as argued by the union. The court had to consider the purpose and effect of the provisions in question and whether they were necessary to achieve a legitimate workplace outcome.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval. It held that the provisions in question, which provided for the classification of certain workers as "employees" for the purposes of the agreement, were not inconsistent with the Act. The Commission found that the provisions were necessary to achieve a legitimate workplace outcome and did not have the effect of undermining the rights of workers under the Act. Accordingly, the court approved the agreement.
The final orders of the court were that the Pathways Aged Care Sailors Bay, NSWNMA HSU NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2013 be approved as a registered agreement under section 235 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court also declared that certain provisions of the agreement, which were the subject of the union's challenge, were not inconsistent with the Act and were therefore valid.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.