Pates, Leslie James v Repatriation Commission

[1985] FCA 686

I ..

f o r the t esponderlt

CONSTITUTIONAL LAC.] - presumptlon a q a ~ n s t esrra-tert-1 t o r l a l

o p e r a t i o n of	Cmmonwcalth s t a t u t e -	whether	appllcable.	c:
REPATRIATICM	-	t r a n s p o r t t o and	t rea tment lr. f o r e q n	rour . t ry -

dc te rmlna t lon pu rpor t lnq t o exclude - e f f e c t .

'- \

.

L

I N THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRP

L	OUFENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY	QLD G i E of 1485
GENERAL DIVISIOCI

BETWEEN :

LESLIE JAWS FATES

Appllc-ant

Arm :

THE REPATRIATION COMMISSION

Respondent

i

MINUTES OF ORDER

JUDGE MAKING ORDER:	rIrm.rs J .
ELTE OF ORDER:	17, JUNE 1935
WHERE MADE:	BRICEANE

THE COURT QRDERS TVAT:

1. Tilat t h e d e c i s i o n of the respondent (2z::~d 2 3

May 1985 wlth r e s p e c t t o a n a p p L i c a t l o n for

t r a n s p o r t t o t h e U.S.A. with a vlew t o a

p o c s l h l e t r a n s p l a n t a t l o n o p e r l t i o n be

quashed.

2 . I r e f e r t h e matter t o tht- respcndent f o r

d e c l s i o n	i n	the	light. of t h e reason5 I have
q lven .

3 . 1 dlL ect Commlss~ t i le on I n It 5

r e c a n s l d e r a t i o n of the mat te no t r t o tre?.t

as r s l e v a n t i t s	deLermlnstlon or 29 January
1985.

4 . I d l r e c t that the respondenr: reconstder the

mzt te r as	soon as	posslble i n vlew	oi I t s
urgency	and. g i v e a	declslon u r g e n t l y and,	I n

any even t , w l th ln s even days from t h e d a t e

of thls -Judgment.

5 . I order that the respondent pay the c c s t s of

the applicant of and i n c l d e c t a l to thece

proceedings, to he taxed.

NOTE:  Set t lement ?nd e n t r y of o r d e r s 1s d e a l t vlth lr. Oraer

36 of t h e F e d e r a l Court: Rules.