Patents Amendment Regulations 2001 (No. 3) (Cth)
Patents Amendment Regulations 2001 (No. 3) 1
Statutory Rules 2001 No. 345 2
I, PETER JOHN HOLLINGWORTH, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, make the following Regulations under the
Patents Act 1990. Dated 20 December 2001
PETER HOLLINGWORTH
Governor-General
By His Excellency’s Command
IAN MACFARLANE
Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources
• •
These Regulations are the
Patents Amendment Regulations 2001 (No. 3) .
These Regulations commence as follows:
(a) on gazettal — regulations 1 to 3 and Schedule 1;
(b) on 1 January 2002 — Schedule 2.
Schedules 1 and 2 amend the
Patents Regulations 1991 .
(regulation 3)
omit specified in paragraphs 4.3 (c), (d) and (e);
insert mentioned in paragraphs 4.3 (1) (c), (d) and (e);
omit referred to in regulation 4.3,
insert mentioned in subregulation 4.3 (1),
substitute
(4) A former attorney, who has been given a notice under subregulation (3), must not refuse to comply with a requirement in the notice.
Penalty: 5 penalty units.
(5) However, it is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (4) if the former attorney has a reasonable excuse.
Note A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the question whether he or she has a reasonable excuse (see section 13.3 of theCriminal Code ).
substitute
(3) A person must comply with a direction given to him or her under this regulation.
Penalty: 5 penalty units.
omit produce any documents
insert produce any documents or articles
substitute
(b) summon the attorney to appear before the Tribunal:
(i) to produce any documents or articles mentioned in the summons; and
(ii) to give evidence to identify the documents or articles.
substitute
(1) A person summoned to appear before the Disciplinary Tribunal must comply with the summons by:
(a) appearing as required by the summons; and
(b) producing documents or articles as required by the summons; and
(c) appearing and reporting to the Tribunal from day to day.
Penalty: 10 penalty units.
(1A) However, it is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (1) if:
(a) the defendant has a reasonable excuse; or
(b) in relation to paragraph (1) (c) — the defendant is excused by the Tribunal.
Note A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters mentioned in subregulation (1A) (see section 13.3 of theCriminal Code ).
(2) A person commits an offence if:
(a) the person:
(i) is not a registered patent attorney to whom subregulation (3) applies; and
(ii) appears as a witness before the Disciplinary Tribunal; and
(iii) has been paid expenses and allowances; and
(b) the expenses and allowances have been determined by the Tribunal in accordance with Part 2 of Schedule 8; and
(c) the person refuses:
(i) to be sworn or make an affirmation; or
(ii) to answer a question relevant to the evidence that he or she was summoned to give.
Penalty: 10 penalty units.
(2A) However, it is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (2) if the person has a reasonable excuse.
Note A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the question whether he or she has a reasonable excuse (see section 13.3 of theCriminal Code ).
(2B) Strict liability applies to the physical element of an offence against subregulation (2) that is constituted by:
(a) the circumstance mentioned in subparagraph (2) (a) (i); and
(b) the circumstance mentioned in paragraph (2) (b).
Note Forstrict liability , see section 6.1 of theCriminal Code .
(3) A person commits an offence if the person:
(a) is a registered patent attorney against whom proceedings have been instituted; and
(b) is summoned to appear at a hearing before the Disciplinary Tribunal in respect of those proceedings; and
(c) refuses:
(i) to be sworn or to make an affirmation; or
(ii) to answer a question relevant to the evidence that he or she was summoned to give.
Penalty: 10 penalty units.
(3A) However, it is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (3) if the person has a reasonable excuse.
Note A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the question whether he or she has a reasonable excuse (see section 13.3 of theCriminal Code ).
omit or fail
(regulation 3)
omit 1 March 2001
insert 1 January 2002
[ 2 ] Schedule 2A, Schedule of Fees, item 2 (a), column 2
omit in excess of 6
insert in excess of 5
substitute
|
|
1. These Regulations amend Statutory Rules 1991 No. 71, as amended by 1991 No. 456; 1992 No. 148; 1993 Nos. 113, 227, 340 and 341; 1994 Nos. 182, 317 and 387; 1995 Nos. 16, 20, 82 and 427; 1996 No. 271; 1997 Nos. 192 and 345; 1998 Nos. 45, 56, 141, 241, 257, 264, 291, 319, 342 and 345; 1999 Nos. 154, 184, 261 and 349; 2000 No. 317; 2001 Nos. 98 and 184.
2. Notified in the
Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 21 December 2001.
0
0
0