Patel (Migration)

[2019] AATA 1270

Patel (Migration) [2019] AATA 1270 (14 January 2019)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANTS:  Mr Ashishkumar Kantibhai Patel
Ms Jignaben Ashishkumar Patel

CASE NUMBER:  1806919

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):           BCC2017/2291963

MEMBER:Nicola Findson

DATE:14 January 2019

PLACE OF DECISION:  Perth

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

·cl.187.233 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994

Statement made on 14 January 2019 at 9:48am

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa– Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) – Direct Entry stream – Retail Manager – nomination refused – decision set aside – nomination approved – decision under review affirmed

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 1.13, 5.19, Schedule 2, cls 187.233

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicants Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicants applied for the visas on 28 June 2017. At the time of application, Class RN contained one subclass: Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme).

3. The criteria for a Subclass 187 visa are set out in Part 187 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the 'Common criteria', as well as the criteria of one of two alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, or the Direct Entry stream.

4. In the present case, the first named applicant (the applicant) is seeking the visa in the Direct Entry stream, to work in the nominated position of Retail Manager (General) (ANZSCO 142111). This stream is designed for persons who have never, or have only briefly worked in the Australian labour market and are applying for the visa outside Australia, or are applying for the visa from inside Australia but are not eligible for the Temporary Residence Transition stream.

5. The delegate refused to grant the visas on the basis that the applicant did not meet cl.187.233 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the nomination in relation to the applicant had been refused.

6. The applicants were represented in relation to the review by their registered migration agent. The representative attended the Tribunal hearing.

7. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

8. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets the requirements of cl.187.233.

   Nomination of a position

9. Clause 187.233 as applicable in this case is set out in full in an attachment to this decision. Essentially, it requires that the position to which the application relates be the subject of an application for approval of a nomination in the Direct Entry stream, located in regional Australia. The position must be the one that was the subject of the declaration made as part of the current visa application.

10. In addition, this criterion also requires that:

    ·the person who will employ the applicant is the person who made nomination

    ·the nomination has been approved and has not been subsequently withdrawn

    ·there is no ‘adverse information’ known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person ‘associated with’ that person (within the meaning of r.1.13A and r.1.13B); or it is reasonable to disregard any such information

    ·the position is still available to the applicant, and

    ·the visa application was made no more than six months after the nomination of the position was approved.

11. The applicant was nominated by A Tasyurdu and G L Tasyurdu for the position of Retail Manager.  The position is the same as in the r.5.19 nomination application and the employer is the nominator.

12. The nomination was initially refused by the Department, however, on 13 January 2019, this Tribunal made a decision to set aside the refusal and substituted a decision approving the nomination.

13. The Tribunal is satisfied that the nomination has not been withdrawn and that the position is still available to the applicant.  The Tribunal is also satisfied that the visa application was not made more than six months after the nomination of the position was approved.

14. There is no evidence before the Tribunal to suggest that there is any relevant adverse information known to the Department. The Tribunal is satisfied there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator.

15. Given the above, the Tribunal finds that the applicant meets all the requirements of cl.187.233.

16. Given these findings, the appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

17. As the second named applicant applied on the basis of being a member of the family unit of the first named applicant, her application will be determined by reference to the outcome of the first named applicant’s application on remittal to the Department for reconsideration.

    DECISION

18. The Tribunal remits the application for Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

    ·cl.187.233 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Nicola Findson
    Member

    ATTACHMENT A

    187.233(1)      The position to which the application relates is the position:

    (a)nominated in an application for approval that seeks to meet the requirements of:

    (i)subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii); or

    (ii)subregulation 5.19(4) as in force before 1 July 2012; and

    (aa)in relation to which the applicant is identified in the application under subparagraph 5.19(4)(a)(ii); and

    (b)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114C (3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

    (2)      The person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination.

    (3)      The Minister has approved the nomination.

    (4)      The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn.

    (4A)    Either:

    (a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

    (b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

    (5)      The position is still available to the applicant.

    (6)      The application for the visa is made no more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.