Passmore v Underdown (Deceased)

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Passmore v Underdown (Deceased) [2010] FCA 70

Citation: Passmore v Underdown (Deceased) [2010] FCA 70
Parties: VINCENSA PASSMORE v SAMANTHA UNDERDOWN (DECEASED)
File number: WAD 214 of 2009
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 13 January 2010
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application for administration of a deceased estate pending in the Supreme Court of Western Australia – whether leave should be given to present a creditor’s petition for administration of a deceased estate under s 244(13) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 244 (1), 244(6), 244(13)
Cases cited: Feliciano Gonzales v Maria De Luz Marmentini, Executrix of the Estate of the Late Ida Garcia Raber [1998] FCA 911
Date of hearing: 13 January 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms K Levy
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kott Gunning
Counsel for the Respondent: No appearance for the respondent.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

WAD 214 of 2009

BETWEEN:

VINCENSA PASSMORE
Applicant

AND:

SAMANTHA UNDERDOWN (DECEASED)
Respondent

JUDGE:

SIOPIS J

DATE OF ORDER:

13 JANUARY 2010

WHERE MADE:

PERTH

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The applicant be granted leave from the Court to present a Form 14 Creditor’s Petition for Administration of the Deceased Person’s Estate (Petition) to the Court under s 244(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (the Act), on such terms as the Court thinks fit, pursuant to s 244(13) of the Act.

2.A sealed copy of the Petition shall be served, pursuant to s 244(9) of the Act on Mr Arturo Fazio.

3.There be liberty to apply.

4.The costs of today be reserved.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

WAD 214 of 2009

BETWEEN:

VINCENSA PASSMORE
Applicant

AND:

SAMANTHA UNDERDOWN (DECEASED)
Respondent

JUDGE:

SIOPIS J

DATE:

13 JANUARY 2010

PLACE:

PERTH

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This is an application which is made under s 244(13) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (the Act). That section provides that:

    Where proceedings have been commenced in a court for the administration of a deceased person’s estate under a law of a State or Territory, a petition for an order under the section in relation to the estate shall not be presented by a creditor except by leave of the Court and on such terms and conditions (if any) as the Court thinks fit.

  2. The applicant’s affidavit evidence discloses that this application arises in the following circumstances.

  3. Ms Underdown, the deceased, brought a claim against the applicant, Ms Passmore, in the Perth Magistrates Court for damages in relation to a property transaction.  On 15 January 2007, the Magistrate dismissed Ms Underdown’s claim.

  4. The Magistrate’s orders gave Ms Passmore liberty to apply for a costs order in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Passmore v Underdown (Deceased) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] FCA 70
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Passmore v Underdown (Deceased) involved the applicant, Passmore, seeking leave to present a creditor's petition for the administration of the estate of a deceased person. The application was lodged in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. The deceased, Underdown, had left behind an estate which was subject to a dispute regarding the appropriate administration and distribution of assets among potential creditors.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the applicant, Passmore, leave to present a creditor's petition for the administration of the deceased estate under section 244(13) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). This required the court to consider the grounds upon which the leave was sought and the potential implications for the creditors involved. The court needed to balance the interests of the creditors with the procedural requirements set out in the Bankruptcy Act.

In its reasoning, the court thoroughly examined the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, particularly focusing on section 244(13) which pertains to the application for leave to present a creditor's petition. The court considered the merits of the application, the evidence provided by Passmore, and the potential impact on other creditors. Ultimately, the court found that the applicant had provided sufficient grounds to warrant granting the leave, ensuring that the interests of all parties involved would be adequately protected during the administration process. Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant be granted leave to present the creditor’s petition, subject to certain conditions and terms, and directed the service of a sealed copy of the petition to the relevant party.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The applicant be granted leave from the Court to present a Form 14 Creditor’s Petition for Administration of the Deceased Person’s Estate (Petition) to the Court under s 244(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (the Act), on such terms as the Court thinks fit, pursuant to s 244(13) of the Act.

2. A sealed copy of the Petition shall be served, pursuant to s 244(9) of the Act on Mr Arturo Fazio.

3. There be liberty to apply.

4. The costs of today be reserved.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.