Parris & Parris

Case [2021] FedCFamC2F 13


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 2)

Parris & Parris [2021] FedCFamC2F 13

File number(s): MLC 1320 of 2021
Judgment of: JUDGE A KELLY
Date of judgment: 8 September 2021
Catchwords:

CHILD SUPPORT – discharge or variation of overseas order for child support – where Superior Court of California makes order for child support, including that it cease upon child attaining majority – where father seeks retrospective discharge of orders – where two of the parties’ children are now adults – where the applicant father is now liable to pay child support for two younger children – where applicant pays no child support from 2015 to 2020 – where mother seeks enforcement of order via Californian Child Support Services Department – where mother registers Order in Australia – where applicant in substantial arrears applies for discharge of order of Superior Court of California – where Australian earnings are withheld and applied in satisfaction of liability – where father accepts ongoing liability for child support – where two elder children are now adults – where father seeks that liability be reassessed, retrospectively, to take account of evolving and present circumstances – applicable principles – whether just cause shown for discharge – whether liability for child support for all children may be reassessed in Australia including for a child not resident in Australia – orders to vary child maintenance.

SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE – discharge or variation of overseas order for spousal maintenance – where Superior Court of California makes order for spousal support – where order provides for spousal support to cease on respondent’s death or remarriage – where applicant migrates to Australia, remarries, becomes an Australian citizen and father to two further children – where applicant secures employment in 2015 – where applicant pays no child support from 2015 to 2020 – where mother seeks enforcement of order via Californian Child Support Services Department – where mother registers Order in Australia – where Australian earnings are withheld and paid in satisfaction of liability – where applicant, in substantial arrears, applies for discharge of order of Superior Court of California – whether just cause shown for discharge – orders to vary spousal maintenance.

PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW – Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance 2007 (No 38) – Convention on the Recovery Abroad of Maintenance 1956 – where judgment of Superior Court of California determines liability of applicant to pay spousal and child support – where applicant departs United States and becomes Australian citizen – where applicant is resident in Australia – where applicant father to two younger children – where applicant is in arrears of liability to pay spousal and child support to former spouse and children in United States – where two of those children are now adults – where applicant now liable in Australia for child support of younger children – where liability under judgment entered on Child Support Register in Australia – where Child Support Registrar gives notice to…

Continue reading Parris & Parris

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Parris & Parris [2021] FedCFamC2F 13
Case
[2021] FedCFamC2F 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, Mr Parris sought to discharge or vary a child support and spousal maintenance order made by the Superior Court of California. The order required Mr Parris to pay child support for two children and spousal support to his former wife. Mr Parris, who had migrated to Australia and remarried, had not paid any child or spousal support since 2015. His former wife sought enforcement of the Californian order through the Australian Child Support Agency. Mr Parris applied to discharge the order or vary it to reflect his current circumstances, including the fact that two of his children had attained majority and he had two younger children. The legal issues before the court were whether there was just cause for the discharge of the Californian order and whether the court had jurisdiction to vary the order to reflect changes in circumstances, including for a child not residing in Australia.

The court found that the Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance 2007 (No 38) and the Convention on the Recovery Abroad of Maintenance 1956 did not bar the Australian court from exercising jurisdiction over the matter. The court concluded that while the conventions facilitated the enforcement of foreign support orders, they did not prevent a court having jurisdiction under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) from considering applications to vary or discharge such orders. The court found that Mr Parris had not shown just cause for the discharge of the Californian order, as he had not made genuine efforts to comply with his obligations. However, the court did find that it was appropriate to vary the order to reflect the changes in circumstances, including the fact that two of the children had attained majority and the need to pay support for the two younger children. The court also varied the spousal maintenance order to reflect the changes in circumstances and ordered that the order cease upon the remarriage or death of the respondent.

The court ordered that the child support and spousal maintenance orders be varied to reflect the changes in circumstances and that the application for discharge be dismissed. The court ordered that the Registrar of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia forward a copy of the order to the Registrar of Child Support. This decision provides guidance on the application of international conventions to child support and spousal maintenance orders and the circumstances in which an Australian court may vary or discharge such orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

MLC 1320 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MR PARRIS

Applicant

AND:

MS PARRIS

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE A KELLY

DATE OF ORDER:

8 SEPTEMBER 2021

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Pursuant to ss 202-203 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth), direct that the parties be allowed to appear and to make submissions before the Court by video and audio link.

2. Pursuant to reg 4(1) of the Family Law Regulations 1984 (Cth), direct that compliance with any requirement to register the order made on 17 March 2014 in the Superior Court of California (FAMMS Case No …) (2014 Order), be dispensed with.

3. Pursuant to reg 36 of the Family Law Regulations 1984 (Cth), the 2014 Order, in relation to spousal support fixed in the sum of USD $500 per month as payable by the applicant to the respondent, liability for which is now entered upon the Child Support Register maintained pursuant to the Child Support (Registration & Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), with effect from 5 February 2020 (reference …), be varied from USD $500 per month to AUD $250 per month with effect from November 2014 and that this order cease to be operative as and from 17 March 2022.

4. Pursuant to reg 36 of the Family Law Regulations 1984 (Cth), the 2014 Order in relation to child support fixed in the sum of USD $446 per month as payable by the applicant to the respondent as support for the children, Ms B born in 2000 and X, born in 2006, liability for which is now entered upon the Child Support Register with effect from 5 February 2020 (reference …), be varied with effect from November 2014 in the case of each such child to the sum of AUD $200 per month and in the case of:

(a) Ms B, with effect 2018, to the sum of $Nil;

(b) X, with effect from 2018, to the sum of AUD $220 per month.

5. Declare that save as provided by paragraph (3) of this Order, the applicant’s liability for spousal support or maintenance as provided by the 2014 Order be discharged.

6. Declare that save as provided by paragraph (4) of this Order, the applicant’s liability for child support or maintenance as provided by the 2014 Order be discharged.

7. The Registrar of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia forward a copy of this Order together with these reasons for judgment to the Registrar of Child Support.

Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.