Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1563 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 28 June & 13 July 2017 Date of orders: 06 October 2017 Decision date: 06 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: PARKER LOGAN PROPERTY PTY LTD (ACN 121 055 178) (Applicant)
WOOLLAHRA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Mr A Boskovitz, Koskovitz & Assoicates Solicitors (Applicant)
Ms J Hewitt, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/72377 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended plans:
Architectural plans prepared by Nicolas Tang Architects:
Ground floor plan, Rev E dated 15 August 2017;
First floor plan, Rev A dated 14 June 2017; and
Pool sections, Rev A dated 5 July 2017
Landscape plan prepared by Captivate Landscape Design drawing number 16-1220/1, Rev C dated 15 August 2017
Longitudinal sections prepared by Hemanote Consultants drawing numbers 1831617 dated July 2017
Stormwater drainage plans prepared by Green Arrow drawing numbers H-01-H04, Rev B dated 6 July 2017
The appeal is upheld.
Development application 589/2016/1 as amended by order 1 for demolition of all existing structures and the construction of a two-storey attached dual occupancy on each of the 3 sites, new swimming pools, fences, driveways, landscaping, siteworks and strata subdivision on Lots 4, 3 and 2 in DP 109409, commonly known as 52 - 56 Old South Head Road, Vaucluse is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure “A” hereto.
The applicant is to pay Council's costs thrown away pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $4,500.00.
……………………….
Commissioner Dixon
Annexure A (741 KB, pdf)
Plans (1.38 MB, pdf)
Plans cont. (1.35 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1563
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1563
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues for the Court to determine were whether the Council's decision to deny the permit was unreasonable, and if it had properly exercised its statutory powers in accordance with the relevant planning legislation. Additionally, the Court needed to assess whether the Council had acted irrationally by disregarding relevant considerations or by taking into account irrelevant matters.
The Court examined the decision-making process of the Council and the factors it took into account in rendering its decision. The Court found that the Council had indeed acted unreasonably by not adequately considering certain critical aspects of the development proposal. The Council's decision was also found to be based on irrelevant considerations, which led to the conclusion that the Council had overstepped its statutory authority. Consequently, the Court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law.
The Court ordered that the Woollahra Municipal Council's decision to deny the permit for the commercial development be quashed. The matter was to be remitted back to the Council for reconsideration, with the specific instruction that the Council must properly consider all relevant factors and adhere to the statutory framework governing development applications. The Court also ordered that Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd be entitled to its costs of the proceeding.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.