Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Waverley Council

[2016] NSWLEC 1035

Land and Environment Court

New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation:	Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1035
Hearing dates:	Conciliation conference on 8 December 2015
Date of orders:	14 January 2016
Decision date:	14 January 2016
Jurisdiction:	Class 1
Before:	Brown C
Decision:	See (5) below
Catchwords:	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: alterations and additions to an approved residential flat building; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited:	Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:	Principal judgment
Parties:	Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent)
Representation:	Mr Anthony Boskovitz (Applicant) Mr Stephen Patterson (Respondent) Solicitors: Boskovitz & Associates (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):	10768 of 2015

Judgment

1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of the amendment of Development Application No. DA – 266/2015 for alterations and additions to an approved residential building at 93 Old South Head Road, Bondi Junction

2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

3. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

5. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.

…………….

G T Brown

Commissioner

10768 of 2015 (s34O) gtb (71.1 KB, pdf)

10768 of 2015 (C) gtb (183 KB, pdf)

Decision last updated: 05 February 2016