Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney
[2017] NSWLEC 1466
•25 August 2017
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2017] NSWLEC 1466 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 4 August 2017 Date of orders: 25 August 2017 Decision date: 25 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Parker Logan Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr A Boskovitz, Boskovitz and Associates Solicitors (Applicant)
Ms R Bullmore, The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/119458 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted for the Applicant to rely on the following amended plans:
Drawing Number
Drawing Title
Architect
Dated
S34 100
Issue ABasement Floor Plan
NTA
09.08.17
S34 101
Issue BGround Floor Plan
NTA
17.08.17
S34 102
Issue AFirst Floor Plan
NTA
09.08.17
S34 103
Issue ASecond Floor Plan
NTA
09.08.17
S34 104
Issue BThird Floor Plan
NTA
17.08.17
S34 105
Issue ARoof Plan
NTA
09.08.17
S34 200
Issue AElevations 1
NTA
09.08.17
S34 201
Issue AElevations 2
NTA
09.08.17
S34 202
Issue BElevations 3
NTA
17.08.17
S34 250
Issue ABooster Detail
NTA
09.08.17
S34 251
Issue AEgress Stair Detail
NTA
09.08.17
S34 300
Issue ASection 1
NTA
09.08.17
S34 301
Issue ASection 2
NTA
09.08.17
S34 500
Issue ADraft Strata Subdivision Plan
NTA
17.08.17
14-873/1
Rev. DLandscape Plan
Captivate Landscape Design
31/10/16
771665M_04
BASIX Certificate
23.08.17
The amendments to the plans listed in (a) are minor and there be no order as to costs under s97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application D/2017/280 which amends Development Consent D/2015/544 (D/2015/544 approved demolition of existing improvements and the construction of 2 x 4 storey residential flat buildings, containing a total of 24 dwellings, over a basement car parking level, and strata subdivision) to include 3 additional dwellings (being 2 x studio and 1 x 2 Bedroom dwellings), allocation of 4 dwellings as affordable housing units and dwelling layout modifications to the dwellings approved under D/2015/544.
Development Application D/2017/280 is approved subject to:
conditions contained in Annexure "A"; and
plans contained in Annexure “B”.
……………………….
Commissioner O’Neill
119458.17 O'Neill - Annexure A - Slip Rule (180 KB, pdf)
119458.17 O'Neill - Annexure B - Plans (7.87 MB, pdf)
Amendments
13 December 2018 - Pursuant to UCPR 36.17, the slip rule, by consent of the parties, amend orders of 25 August 2017 so that the first line of Condition (A2) of Annexure A is amended as follows:
1. The number “3” is replaced with the number “11”.
2. The word “followings” is replaced with the word “follows”.
As a result the first line of Condition (A2) of Annexure A now reads:
“(A2) That Part (a) of Condition 11 of D/2015/544 shall be replaced as follows:”
Decision last updated: 13 December 2018
0
0
2