Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Bayside Council
[2018] NSWLEC 1175
•06 April 2018
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2018] NSWLEC 1175 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 6 April 2018 Date of orders: 06 April 2018 Decision date: 06 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See [5] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Bayside Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Anthony Boskovitz, Boskovitz & Associates (Applicant)
John Cole, HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/195991 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against a deemed refusal by Bayside Council of development application No. .2017/1063. The proposal involves the demolition of existing structures and construction of a new part three (3) part four (4) storey with attic level boarding house containing 73 self-contained rooms, including 4 adaptable units, a manager dwelling, a communal room and a communal open space on the ground floor level, and basement level car parking at 25-29 Daphne Street, Botany (Lots 1, 2 and 3 DP 227575).
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted to rely on the amended plans at Annexure A and as referred to in condition 1 of Annexure B.
The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed amount of $15,500 within 28 days of these orders.
The appeal is upheld;
Development Application No. 2017/1063 for the demolition of the existing industrial/warehouse buildings and the construction of a 66 room boarding house and associated structures at 25-29 Daphne Street, Botany, is approved subject to the conditions within Annexure B.
……………………….
D M Dickson
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (4.43 MB, pdf)
Annexure B (138 KB, pdf)
Decision last updated: 13 April 2018
0
0
2