Pappas and Anor and Ugapathai

Link copied
Case Copied 14 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

PAPPAS AND ANOR & UGAPATHAI [2017] FamCA 1090

FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Commercial surrogacy – hearing in the absence of the respondent – service attempted unsuccessfully on the respondent – best interests of the child – where the applicants seek orders for equal shared parental responsibility – where the applicants seek orders that the child live with them – order made for the applicants to have equal shared parental responsibility for the child – order made for the child to live with the applicants.

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60CC, 60CA, 61B, 64B(2)(i), 65C(c), 69ZN(7)

Bernieres and Anor & Dhopal and Anor [2017] FamCAFC 180
Ellison and Anor & Karnchanit [2012] FamCA 602
Fisher-Oakley & Kittur [2014] FamCA 123
Mankiewicz & Anor & Swallow & Anor [2016] FamCAFC 153
Mason & Mason and Anor [2013] FamCA 424

1st APPLICANT: Mr Pappas
2nd APPLICANT: Ms Pappas
RESPONDENT: Ms Ugapathai
FILE NUMBER: MLC 819 of 2016
DATE DELIVERED: 21 December 2017
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Melbourne
JUDGMENT OF: Thornton J
HEARING DATE: 5 December 2017

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANTS: Mr L
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANTS: Anderson Family Lawyers
THE RESPONDENT: No Appearance

Orders

  1. That the applicants have equal shared parental responsibility for the child B born … 2015 (“the child”);

  2. That the child live with the applicants.

  3. The applicants’ solicitors, Anderson Family Lawyers serve upon the respondent by sending by registered post:

    (a)       a sealed copy of these orders;

    (b)       a certified Country M translation of these orders;

    (c)       a covering letter explaining these orders; and

    (d)       a certified Country M translation of the covering letter:

    to the respondent’s addresses of C Street, Provence D, Country M and E Street, Provence F, Country M.

  4. Pursuant to s 65DA(2) and s 62B, the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders and details of who can assist parties adjust to and comply with an order are set out in the Fact Sheet attached hereto and these particulars are included in these orders.

  5. All extant applications be otherwise dismissed.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Pappas and Anor & Ugapathai has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE

FILE NUMBER: MLC 819 of 2016

Mr Pappas and Ms Pappas

Applicants

And

Ms Ugapathai

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

introduction

  1. The applicants seek orders for equal shared parental responsibility for the two year old…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Pappas and Anor and Ugapathai and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] FamCA 1090
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Pappas and Anor and Ugapathai*, heard before Thornton J, the applicants sought orders concerning the parental responsibility and living arrangements for a child. The dispute concerned the future care and upbringing of the child, B, born in 2015.

The court was required to determine the appropriate orders regarding equal shared parental responsibility for the child, and where the child should live. The court also had to consider the method of service of these orders upon the respondent, who resided in Country M.

Thornton J made orders for equal shared parental responsibility for the child B, and that the child live with the applicants. The court further ordered that the applicants' solicitors serve sealed copies of the orders, along with a covering letter explaining them, and certified translations of both documents into Country M language, via registered post to the respondent's addresses in Country M. Additionally, the court incorporated a Fact Sheet detailing the obligations and consequences of contravening the orders, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation. All other extant applications were dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the applicants have equal shared parental responsibility for the child B born … 2015 (“the child”);

2.

That the child live with the applicants.

3.

The applicants’ solicitors, Anderson Family Lawyers serve upon the respondent by sending by registered post:

(a) a sealed copy of these orders;

(b) a certified Country M translation of these orders;

(c) a covering letter explaining these orders; and

(d) a certified Country M translation of the covering letter:

to the respondent’s addresses of C Street, Provence D, Country M and E Street, Provence F, Country M.

4.

Pursuant to s 65DA(2) and s 62B, the particulars of the obligations these orders create and the particulars of the consequences that may follow if a person contravenes these orders and details of who can assist parties adjust to and comply with an order are set out in the Fact Sheet attached hereto and these particulars are included in these orders.

5.

All extant applications be otherwise dismissed.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.