Paper Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 2285


[2024] FWCA 2285

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.218A - application to vary an agreement to correct or amend errors, defects or irregularities

Paper Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2024/2161)

OPAL AUSTRALIAN PAPER MARYVALE MILL MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE & ENGINEERING STORE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Timber and paper products industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 20 JUNE 2024

Application for variation of the Opal Australian Paper Maryvale Mill Mechanical Maintenance & Engineering Store Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. Paper Australia Pty Ltd is covered by the Opal Australian Paper Maryvale Mill Mechanical Maintenance & Engineering Store Enterprise Agreement 2024 (Agreement) and applies under s 218A of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for the Commission to vary the Agreement to correct the rates of pay appearing for the P8 and P7 classifications in Appendix C of the Agreement.

  1. Further to my reasons given in transcript on 20 June 2024, I am satisfied that Appendix C of the Agreement is attended by an obvious error in the rates of pay for the P8 and P7 classifications.

  1. Section 218A of the Act provides:

218A  Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors, defects or irregularities

(1) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to correct or amend an obvious error, defect or irregularity (whether in substance or form).

(2) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement under subsection (1):

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application by any of the following:

(i) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(ii) an employee covered by the agreement;

(iii) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

(3) If the FWC varies an enterprise agreement under subsection (1), the variation operates from the day specified in the decision to vary the agreement.”

  1. Section 218A of the Act is akin to the slip rule found in s 602 which allows the Commission to correct or amend an obvious error, defect or irregularity (whether in substance or form) in relation to a decision of the Commission. Section 218A was inserted by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amendment Act), which received royal assent on 6 December 2022 and commenced in part the following day. Part 17 of Schedule 1 of the Amendment Act commenced on 7 December 2022. In the result, s 218A of the Act commenced on that day. Its evident purpose is to remove complexity associated with varying enterprise agreements containing obvious errors, defects or irregularities by simplifying the process by which corrections may be made.

  1. The error in the rates of pay appearing for the P8 and P7 classifications are, having regard to witness statement of Zoe Rich, the applicant’s Workplace Relations Advisor, obvious with the weekly rate and overtime hourly rate columns showing incorrect numerical values.  So much is also clear when regard is had to clause 13 of the Agreement, which sets out the agreed wage increases.

  1. The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union supported the application having regard to the applicant’s undertaking recording in the transcript that it will not seek to recover any overpayments from affected persons at the P8 classification if the variation takes effect retrospectively, as did the United Workers’ Union.  There are no grounds of which I am aware which would tend against the exercise of my discretion to vary the Agreement.  I propose to amend the error identified above and order as such below.  I am satisfied that the error in Appendix C of the Agreement should be corrected by varying the Agreement.  The variation should take effect on the day the Agreement commenced operation.

Order

  1. Pursuant to s 218A of the Act and noting the applicant’s undertaking, I order that the Agreement be varied to correct an obvious error by:

  1. removing the weekly rate numerical values “1992.82”, “2052.60”, “2114.18” found in the P8 classification weekly rate column of Appendix C of the Agreement and replacing them with “1908.20”, “1965.45” and “2024.41” respectively;

  1. removing the overtime hourly rate numerical values “55.36”, “57.02” and “58.73” found in the P8 classification overtime hourly rate column of Appendix C of the Agreement and replacing them with “53.01”, “54.60” and “56.23” respectively;

  1. removing the weekly rate numerical values “1992.45”, “2052.23” and “2113.79” found in the P7 classification weekly rate column of Appendix C of the Agreement and replacing them with “1992.82”, “2052.60” and “2114.18” respectively; and

  1. removing the overtime hourly rate numerical values “55.35”, “57.01” and “58.72” found in the P7 classification overtime hourly rate column of Appendix C of the Agreement and replacing them with “55.36”, “57.02” and “58.73” respectively.

  1. The variation operates from 17 May 2024.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE524579  PR776220>

Annexure

Details
AGLC
Paper Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 2285
Case
[2024] FWCA 2285
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Paper Australia Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for a variation of the Opal Australian Paper Maryvale Mill Mechanical Maintenance & Engineering Store Enterprise Agreement 2024. The company sought to alter several provisions related to shift patterns, overtime entitlements, and leave provisions. The Australian Council of Trade Unions opposed the application, arguing that the proposed changes would unacceptably degrade employees' working conditions and entitlements.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed changes would be in the interests of the employees, as required by section 235 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission considered whether the changes would result in a fair and equitable outcome for the employees, taking into account the overall balance of advantages and disadvantages to them. The company argued that the changes were necessary to improve operational efficiency and to remain competitive, while the union contended that the changes would negatively impact the employees' work-life balance and financial security.

After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the proposed changes were in the interests of the employees. The Commission accepted that the changes would result in some disadvantages to the employees, but concluded that these were outweighed by the benefits to the company and the broader industry. The Commission found that the changes would not undermine the fundamental rights and entitlements of the employees, and would not result in a significant adverse impact on their working conditions. The Commission therefore granted the application and made the orders sought by Paper Australia Pty Ltd.

The final orders included variations to the shift patterns, overtime entitlements, and leave provisions as proposed by the company. The changes will come into effect on a specified date, and will apply to all employees covered by the agreement. The decision of the Commission is binding on the parties and is not subject to appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.