Papallo v Cumberland Council

Case

[2018] NSWLEC 1127

12 March 2018

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Papallo v Cumberland Council [2018] NSWLEC 1127
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 13 February and 1 and 8 March 2018
Date of orders: 12 March 2018
Decision date: 12 March 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Bish C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Maggie Papallo (Applicant)
Cumberland Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Peter Rigg, Peter R Rigg (Applicant)
Adam Seton, Marsdens Law Group(Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/277821
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend development application DA2017/184 by substituting the following plans for the plans that are the subject of DA 2017/184:

Plan Name

Revision

Date

Sediment Control Plan, Drawing No. 0004

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

Demolition Plan, Drawing No. 0005

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

Site Plan, Drawing No. 0007

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

Basement Plan, Drawing No. 1001

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. 1002

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

Level 1, Drawing No. 1003

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

Level 2, Drawing No. 1004

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

Rood Plan, Drawing No. 1005

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

North/ South Elevation, Drawing No. 2001

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

East/West Elevation, Drawing No. 2002

L.E.C. / Issues C

16/02/2018

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Development Application DA 2017/184 for the demolition of existing buildings and structures on site and the construction of a part 3, part 4 storey boarding house comprising 18 rooms and 1 managers residence over basement parking accommodating 7 car parking spaces and 4 motor cycle spaces, pursuant to the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009, on the land at 16 Billabong Street, Pendle Hill, is approved subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure “A”.

……………………….

Sarah Bish

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (184 KB, pdf)

Annexure B Plans (5.76 MB, pdf)

Amendments

15 March 2018 - Correct Annexure A attached

Decision last updated: 15 March 2018

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1