Pancho (Migration)
[2024] AATA 2877
•18 July 2024
Pancho (Migration) [2024] AATA 2877 (18 July 2024)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Miss Angeley Mae Suico Pancho
REPRESENTATIVE: Mrs Marimi Tanag (MARN: 1386887)
CASE NUMBER: 2410683
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2023/4158320
COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Philippines
MEMBER:Linda Holub
DATE:18 July 2024
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Child (Residence) (Class BT) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 802 (Child) visa:
·PIC 4007(1)(aa) for the purposes of cl 802.223 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Statement made on 18 July 2024 at 1:46pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Child (Residence) (Class BT) visa – Subclass 802 (Child) – health criteria – medical assessments undertaken – decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl 802.223; Schedule 4, PIC 4007STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 15 April 2024 to refuse to grant the applicant a Child (Residence) (Class BT) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).
The visa applicant applied for the visa on 19 July 2023. The delegate refused to grant the visa as the applicant did not satisfy cl 802.223 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations) because the health criteria in Public Interest Criterion (‘PIC’) 4007 of Schedule 4 to the Regulations was not met.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
The applicant was represented in relation to the review.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The issue in this review is whether the visa applicant meets Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4007 as required by the criteria for the grant of the visa. Public Interest Criterion 4007, as it applies to this case, is extracted in the attachment to this decision. It requires the applicant, in certain circumstances, to undergo medical assessment, and to be free of certain diseases or conditions that may impact on the community. This last requirement may be waived in certain circumstances. The applicant in this case had not undertaken the medical assessments specified.
Has the applicant undertaken a medical assessment (PIC 4007(1)(aa))?
Clause 4007(1)(aa) requires that if the applicant is in a specified class of persons, he or she must undertake the specified medical assessment and be assessed by a specified person unless a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth (MOC) decides otherwise. The relevant class of persons and assessments are specified in IMMI15/144.
Information before the Tribunal is that the applicant has been health cleared on 1 June 2024.
For these reasons the requirements in PIC 4007(1)(aa) are met.
Given the findings above, the appropriate course is to remit the application for the visa to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for a Child (Residence) (Class BT) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 802 (Child) visa:
·PIC 4007(1)(aa) for the purposes of cl 802.223 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Linda Holub
Member
ATTACHMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
Schedule 4
4007(1) The applicant:
(aa) if the applicant is in a class of persons specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this paragraph:
(i)must undertake any medical assessment specified in the instrument; and
(ii)must be assessed by the person specified in the instrument;
unless a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth decides otherwise; and
(ab) must comply with any request by a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth to undertake a medical assessment; and
(a) is free from tuberculosis; and
(b) is free from a disease or condition that is, or may result in the applicant being, a threat to public health in Australia or a danger to the Australian community; and
(c) subject to subclause (2) — is free from a disease or condition in relation to which:
(i)a person who has it would be likely to:
(A)require health care or community services; or
(B)meet the medical criteria for the provision of a community service;
during the period described in subclause (1A); and
(ii)the provision of the health care or community services would be likely to:
(A)result in a significant cost to the Australian community in the areas of health care and community services; or
(B)prejudice the access of an Australian citizen or permanent resident to health care or community services;
regardless of whether the health care or community services will actually be used in connection with the applicant; and
(d) if the applicant is a person from whom a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth has requested a signed undertaking to present himself or herself to a health authority in the State or Territory of intended residence in Australia for a follow-up medical assessment — has provided the undertaking.
(1A)For subparagraph (1)(c)(i), the period is:
(a) for an application for a permanent visa — the period commencing when the application is made; or
(b) for an application for a temporary visa:
(i)the period for which the Minister intends to grant the visa; or
(ii)if the visa is of a subclass specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this subparagraph — the period commencing when the application is made.
(1B)If:
(a) the applicant applies for a temporary visa; and
(b) the subclass being applied for is not specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing made for subparagraph (1A)(b)(ii);
the reference in sub-subparagraph (1)(c)(ii)(A) to health care and community services does not include the health care and community services specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing made for this subclause.
(2)The Minister may waive the requirements of paragraph (1)(c) if.
(a) the applicant satisfies all other criteria for the grant of the visa applied for; and
(b) the Minister is satisfied that the granting of the visa would be unlikely to result in:
(i)undue cost to the Australian community; or
(ii)undue prejudice to the access to health care or community services of an Australian citizen or permanent resident.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
0
0
0