Palkovich v Palkovich

[2016] HCASL 335

PALKOVICH

v

PALKOVICH
[2016] HCASL 335
S202/2016

1. The applicant requires an extension of time, but it would be futile to grant the extension which is sought.

2. The application for special leave to appeal does not raise a question of general importance.  The applicant's proposed appeal ground would not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave.  Special leave should be refused with costs.

3. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

S.M. Kiefel
14 December 2016 M.M. Gordon