[2014] FWCA 653 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Palcove Pty Ltd T/A Cheap as Chips
(AG2013/12214)
CHEAP AS CHIPS (RETAIL VICTORIAN STAFF) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Retail industry | |
COMMISSIONER BULL | SYDNEY, 28 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Cheap as Chips (Retail Victorian Staff) Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cheap as Chips (Retail Victorian Staff) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
Undertakings
Meal allowance
[2] The Commission wrote to the Applicant via its legal representative and requested an undertaking be provided with respect to clause 5.8 - Meal Allowance of the Agreement. While the Commission notes that the clause was in similar terms to the meal allowance clause provided for under the General Retail Industry Award 2010 (the Award), being the relevant modern award for the purpose of the better off overall test, the Agreement clause did not provide a further meal allowance where overtime worked by an employee exceeds four hours as provided for under the Award.
[3] The Applicant has provided an undertaking that where overtime work exceeds four hours a further meal allowance of $15.09 will be paid.
Span of ordinary hours
[4] In its correspondence to the Applicant, the Commission noted that the span of ordinary hours of work provided for at clause 6.1 - Hours of work/Overtime, and in particular sub clause 6.1.2 of the Agreement are greater than the span of ordinary hours of work provided for under the Award.
[5] The Applicant has provided an undertaking that it will apply the span of ordinary hours of work provisions as per clause 27.2(a) of the Award.
[6] These undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A.
[7] The Agreement covers retail employees covered by classification levels 1 to 4 of the Award and who are based in Victoria. I am satisfied that pursuant to s.186(3A) of the Act, this group is fairly chosen as being operationally or organisationally distinct.
[8] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.
[9] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) the Agreement will operate from 4 February 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406577 PR547188>
- AGLC
- Palcove Pty Ltd T/A Cheap as Chips [2014] FWCA 653
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 653
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the enterprise agreement was genuinely bargained, free from coercion, and complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions as outlined by the Act, and whether it was made in good faith. Furthermore, the court assessed if the agreement was fair and reasonable for the employees it covered.
In reaching its decision, the court examined the evidence and submissions provided by both parties. It considered the bargaining process, the content of the agreement, and the compliance with statutory requirements. The court found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and did not contain any elements of coercion. It also confirmed that the agreement included all the mandated minimum terms and conditions and was made in good faith. Consequently, the court approved the Cheap as Chips (Retail Victorian Staff) Enterprise Agreement 2013, finding it to be fair and reasonable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.