Pacific Brands Workwear Group T/A Yakka Pty Ltd

[2013] FWCA 1226

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Pacific Brands Workwear Group T/A Yakka Pty Ltd
(AG2013/141)

YAKKA (SOMERTON) & NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS CERTIFIED AGREEMENT 2012.

Storage services
JUSTICE BOULTON, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT	SYDNEY, 22 FEBRUARY 2013

Application for approval of the Yakka (Somerton) & National Union of Workers Certified Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Yakka (Somerton) & National Union of Workers Certified Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] Clause 7.2 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement shall be read and interpreted in conjunction with the National Employment Standards (NES) and where there is an inconsistency between the two the more beneficial provision to an employee shall take precedence. In this regard it is noted that some clauses in the Agreement (in particular clauses: 17; 31; 32; 33; and 36) may be less beneficial to an employee than the NES. Where the Agreement excludes, displaces or provides for a less beneficial provision, the NES will apply pursuant to ss.55 and 61 of the Act.

[3] The Agreement was not lodged within 14 days after it was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) of the Act, I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application until the actual date of lodgement.

[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 that are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the organisation.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2015.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in the case were Pacific Brands Workwear Group T/A Yakka Pty Ltd and the National Union of Workers. The dispute centred around the application for approval of the Yakka (Somerton) & National Union of Workers Certified Agreement 2012. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The legal issues that the court had to determine were whether the agreement was suitable for registration under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether it complied with the requirements of section 232 of the Act, and if it was in the best interest of the employees.

The court examined the agreement and its provisions, including the terms and conditions of employment, the dispute resolution mechanisms, and the overall fairness of the agreement. The court considered submissions from both parties and the implications of the agreement on the employees. The court found that the agreement was suitable for registration and approved it. The court determined that the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and that it was in the best interest of the employees.

The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the overall fairness of the agreement. The court found that the agreement provided for adequate protections for the employees and that it was not detrimental to their interests. The court also noted that the agreement was the result of good faith negotiations between the parties and that it reflected a fair and reasonable outcome for both parties. The court's approval of the agreement was based on a comprehensive assessment of the agreement and its provisions.

The final orders of the court included the approval of the Yakka (Somerton) & National Union of Workers Certified Agreement 2012. The court also made orders for the registration of the agreement under the Fair Work Act. The court's decision provided clarity and certainty for both parties and ensured that the agreement was fair and reasonable for all parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established