DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE O'SULLIVAN
No D1761 of 2007
| P | Applicant |
| and | |
| KEITH WILLIAM SPOKES | Respondent |
BRISBANE
..DATE 16/10/2007
ORDER
HER HONOUR: This is an application by P for criminal
compensation from Kenneth William Spokes.
On 5th November 2001 the respondent was found guilty of one
count of attempted unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under
16, one count, and one count of unlawfully and indecently
dealing with a child under 16 years.
At the time of the offences the applicant was aged 13, nearly
14, and the respondent was 20.
...
HER HONOUR: The circumstances of the offences are set out in
my sentencing remarks.
The incident had an immediate and serious psychological
effects on the applicant.
I note that Dr Evans, in a report which has been filed in
support of the application, says there was no psychiatric
history prior to the offences.
After the assault the applicant attended a counsellor at
Protect All Children Today for "roughly two years". The
applicant also had subsequent psychological episodes, to
use the terminology of Dr Evans. She was admitted to hospital
at the Mental Health Unit at Redlands Hospital and the
Adolescent Mental Health Unit at Logan Hospital. She was
first admitted on 21 January 2001 and was transferred to the
Logan Hospital.
I quote from page 3 of the written Submissions:
"She was quiet, withdrawn, refused to eat, experienced a
dream-like state, had auditory hallucinations, mood
disturbance, paranoid ideation and disturbances of
thought form. She was diagnosed as suffering from a
Brief Reactive psychosis, and treated with containment
and anti-psychotic medication. She was admitted again on
29 June 2002. On this occasion her symptoms included
refusal to eat or speak, agitation and tearfulness.
There were no psychotic features noted at this time. Her
diagnosis was of a Conversion Disorder. She settled
rapidly on this admission."
As at the date of her report (which I note is somewhat old,
2004) Dr Evans notes that there is evidence of an Anxiety
Disorder Not Otherwise Specified, of a moderate degree.
Dr Evans noted that an Anxiety Disorder Not Otherwise
Specified includes disorders with prominent anxiety or phobic
avoidance which do not meet criteria for any specific anxiety
disorder or adjustment disorder.
Dr Evans notes that the psychological problems the applicant
experienced had a major effect on her education and
occupational function. Indeed, Dr Evans considered at that
time (2004) in her then state the applicant was unemployable.
Dr Evans notes that the condition of the applicant immediately
following the incident was serious. She stopped eating for
two to three weeks. She was hospitalised. She refused to
speak. She could not recognise her parents. She dropped from
65 to 48 kilos in three weeks.
The applicant has filed an affidavit outlining her continuing
difficulties, and that affidavit includes the effects
immediately following the incident, most of which are also
recorded in Dr Evans' report, and also the continuing effects.
Very unfortunately the applicant suffered ridicule at school
as a…
Continue reading P v. Spokes
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- P v Spokes [2007] QDC 308
- Case
- [2007] QDC 308
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was the quantification of damages under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 2003 (Qld), focusing on the severity of the psychological harm suffered by P. The court examined medical reports and P's affidavit detailing the immediate and long-term effects of the assault. The court also needed to distinguish between symptoms related to general mental and nervous shock and those specifically attributed to the sexual nature of the crime.
In ruling on the application, the court accepted Dr. Evans' report which indicated that P had no prior psychiatric history but suffered a severe psychological reaction following the assault, including brief reactive psychosis and a conversion disorder. The court noted that P's condition deteriorated significantly, affecting her education, social life, and future career prospects. The judge concluded that P's condition warranted a 20% award for mental and nervous shock, equating to $15,000, and a 25% award for adverse impacts of a sexual nature, totaling $18,750. Therefore, the total award was set at $33,750.
The District Court ordered the respondent to pay $33,750 to the applicant as criminal compensation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.