P v. Spokes

Case [2007] QDC 308


[2007] QDC 308

DISTRICT COURT

CIVIL JURISDICTION

JUDGE O'SULLIVAN

No D1761 of 2007

P Applicant

and

KEITH WILLIAM SPOKES Respondent

BRISBANE

..DATE 16/10/2007

ORDER

HER HONOUR:  This is an application by P for criminal

compensation from Kenneth William Spokes.

On 5th November 2001 the respondent was found guilty of one

count of attempted unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under

16, one count, and one count of unlawfully and indecently

dealing with a child under 16 years.

At the time of the offences the applicant was aged 13, nearly

14, and the respondent was 20.

...

HER HONOUR:  The circumstances of the offences are set out in

my sentencing remarks.

The incident had an immediate and serious psychological

effects on the applicant.

I note that Dr Evans, in a report which has been filed in

support of the application, says there was no psychiatric

history prior to the offences.

After the assault the applicant attended a counsellor at

Protect All Children Today for "roughly two years".  The

applicant also had subsequent psychological episodes, to

use the terminology of Dr Evans.  She was admitted to hospital

at the Mental Health Unit at Redlands Hospital and the

Adolescent Mental Health Unit at Logan Hospital.  She was

first admitted on 21 January 2001 and was transferred to the

Logan Hospital.

I quote from page 3 of the written Submissions:

"She was quiet, withdrawn, refused to eat, experienced a
     dream-like state, had auditory hallucinations, mood
     disturbance, paranoid ideation and disturbances of
     thought form.  She was diagnosed as suffering from a
     Brief Reactive psychosis, and treated with containment
     and anti-psychotic medication.  She was admitted again on
     29 June 2002.  On this occasion her symptoms included
     refusal to eat or speak, agitation and tearfulness.
     There were no psychotic features noted at this time.  Her
     diagnosis was of a Conversion Disorder.  She settled
     rapidly on this admission."

As at the date of her report (which I note is somewhat old,

2004) Dr Evans notes that there is evidence of an Anxiety

Disorder Not Otherwise Specified, of a moderate degree.

Dr Evans noted that an Anxiety Disorder Not Otherwise

Specified includes disorders with prominent anxiety or phobic

avoidance which do not meet criteria for any specific anxiety

disorder or adjustment disorder.

Dr Evans notes that the psychological problems the applicant

experienced had a major effect on her education and

occupational function.  Indeed, Dr Evans considered at that

time (2004) in her then state the applicant was unemployable.

Dr Evans notes that the condition of the applicant immediately

following the incident was serious.  She stopped eating for

two to three weeks.  She was hospitalised.  She refused to

speak.  She could not recognise her parents.  She dropped from

65 to 48 kilos in three weeks.

The applicant has filed an affidavit outlining her continuing

difficulties, and that affidavit includes the effects

immediately following the incident, most of which are also

recorded in Dr Evans' report, and also the continuing effects.

Very unfortunately the applicant suffered ridicule at school

as a…

Continue reading P v. Spokes

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
P v Spokes [2007] QDC 308
Case
[2007] QDC 308
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of P v. Spokes, heard in the District Court of Queensland, involves an application by P for criminal compensation from Keith William Spokes. P, who was 13 years old at the time of the offences, seeks compensation for the severe psychological impact resulting from her sexual assault by Spokes in 2001. Spokes was convicted of attempted unlawful carnal knowledge and indecently dealing with a child under 16. The court was required to determine the extent of P's psychological harm and the appropriate compensation amount, considering both the general category of mental and nervous shock and the specific adverse impacts of a sexual nature.

The primary legal issue was the quantification of damages under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 2003 (Qld), focusing on the severity of the psychological harm suffered by P. The court examined medical reports and P's affidavit detailing the immediate and long-term effects of the assault. The court also needed to distinguish between symptoms related to general mental and nervous shock and those specifically attributed to the sexual nature of the crime.

In ruling on the application, the court accepted Dr. Evans' report which indicated that P had no prior psychiatric history but suffered a severe psychological reaction following the assault, including brief reactive psychosis and a conversion disorder. The court noted that P's condition deteriorated significantly, affecting her education, social life, and future career prospects. The judge concluded that P's condition warranted a 20% award for mental and nervous shock, equating to $15,000, and a 25% award for adverse impacts of a sexual nature, totaling $18,750. Therefore, the total award was set at $33,750.

The District Court ordered the respondent to pay $33,750 to the applicant as criminal compensation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.