P.M.R. Quarries Pty Ltd and Ransberg Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 4765


[2019] FWCA 4765
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

P.M.R. Quarries Pty Ltd and Ransberg Pty Ltd
(AG2018/6444)

W.A. LIMESTONE, W.A. BLUEMETAL & W.A. PREMIX WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018

Quarrying industry

COMMISSIONER GREGORY

MELBOURNE, 9 JULY 2019

Application for approval of the W.A. Limestone, W.A. Bluemetal & W.A. Premix Western Australian Enterprise Agreement 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the W.A. Limestone, W.A. Bluemetal & W.A. Premix Western Australian Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by P.M.R. Quarries Pty Ltd and Ransberg Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved. Despite clause 6(a) of the Agreement, the Agreement will operate from 16 July 2019, in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 July 2023, in accordance with s.186(5) of the Act.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE504355  PR710147>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
P.M.R. Quarries Pty Ltd and Ransberg Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 4765
Case
[2019] FWCA 4765
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, P.M.R. Quarries Pty Ltd and Ransberg Pty Ltd, sought approval of the Western Australian Enterprise Agreement 2018, which outlines the terms and conditions of employment for workers in the limestone, blue metal, and premix industries in Western Australia. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission in Australia, which was tasked with assessing whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and if it complied with the relevant legislative framework.

The primary legal issues that the Commission had to address were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for the employees' minimum entitlements and whether it was free from any unfair provisions. The Commission also had to determine if the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties and if the employees had been adequately informed about the agreement. Furthermore, the Commission considered whether the agreement would promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations.

After considering the submissions from both parties and reviewing the agreement, the Commission found that the proposed agreement did not provide for the employees' minimum entitlements as required by the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission determined that the agreement did not adequately address the issue of overtime rates, which was a significant concern for the employees. Additionally, the Commission found that the agreement did not sufficiently protect the employees' rights to access their employment records. As a result, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the agreement. The applicants were given an opportunity to revise the agreement and resubmit it for consideration by the Commission.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.