[2016] FWCA 619
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.222 - Application for approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement |
| Oxfam Australia |
| (AG2015/7125) |
OXFAM AUSTRALIA AND AUSTRALIAN SERVICES UNION
ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Health and welfare services
| COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 5 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for termination of the Oxfam Australia and Australian Services Union Enterprise
Agreement 2012.
[1] On 21 December 2015, Oxfam Australia made an application pursuant to s.222 of the
Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Oxfam Australia and Australian Services
Union Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement).
[2] No opposition to the application was received by or on behalf of any employees. The
views of the Australian Services Union, which is covered by the Agreement pursuant to
s.183(1) of the Act, were sought as to the application to terminate the Agreement, however no
such views were forthcoming.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the matters contained in ss.222 and 223 of the Act have
been met.
[4] The Agreement is terminated and, in accordance with s.224 of the Act, the termination
will come into effect from 5 February 2016.
| Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer |
COMMISSIONER
<Price code A, AE897564 PR576567>
- AGLC
- Oxfam Australia [2016] FWCA 619
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 619
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commissioner found that all the necessary matters under section 222 and 223 of the Act had been met, including that the application was made in good faith and that the agreement could not be maintained. The Commissioner was satisfied that there were no employees or the union opposing the termination and that the agreement could not be maintained. The Commissioner determined that the termination of the agreement would come into effect from 5 February 2016, in accordance with section 224 of the Act.
Oxfam Australia's application to terminate the enterprise agreement was approved by the Commissioner. The termination of the agreement was effective from 5 February 2016. The Commissioner found that all the necessary matters under section 222 and 223 of the Act had been met, including that the application was made in good faith and that the agreement could not be maintained. The Commissioner was satisfied that there were no employees or the union opposing the termination and that the agreement could not be maintained. The decision was made in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.