OUI -v- THE QUEEN [2006] WASCA 76
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2006] WASCA 76 | |
| THE COURT OF APPEAL (WA) | |||
| Case No: | CACR:93/2005 | 9 MARCH 2006 | |
| Coram: | STEYTLER P MCLURE JA BUSS JA | 19/05/06 | |
| 10 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Appeal against conviction dismissed Appeal against sentence dismissed | ||
| D | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | KUI LING OUI THE QUEEN |
Catchwords: | Criminal law Content of good character direction Whether means "otherwise" good character Whether sentence manifestly excessive |
Legislation: | Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), Pt IB, s 21E Criminal Code (Cth), s 11.1(1) Customs Act 1901 (Cth), s 233B(1)(c), s 235 |
Case References: | F v The Queen [2005] WASCA 135 Johnson v The Queen [2004] WASCA 207 Melbourne v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 1 R v Bellissimo (1996) 84 A Crim R 465 R v Chan (1989) 38 A Crim R 337 R v Falealili [1996] 3 NZLR 664 R v Harris (2004) 150 A Crim R 509 R v Marchesano (2000) 116 A Crim R 237 R v Tulloh (2004) 147 A Crim R 107 R v Zoppola-Barraza [1994] Crim LR 833 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Grimwood v The Queen [2002] WASCA 135 Higgins v Robinson [2000] WASCA 311 Isaacs v The Queen (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Kaye v The Queen [2004] WASCA 227 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke [1996] 2 VR 520 R v Darwell (1997) 94 A Crim R 35 R v El-Karhani (1990) 51 A Crim R 123 R v Furness (1995) 79 A Crim R 59 R v M (1998) 104 A Crim R 154 R v Mills [1998] 4 VR 235 R v Nai Poon (2003) 56 NSWLR 284 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Suarez-Mejia (2002) 131 A Crim R 577 R v Tait and Bartley (1979) 46 FLR 386 R v Wedd (2000) 115 A Crim R 205 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Trimboli v The Queen (1979) 21 SASR 577 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : THE COURT OF APPEAL (WA) CITATION : OUI -v- THE QUEEN [2006] WASCA 76 CORAM : STEYTLER P
- MCLURE JA
BUSS JA
- CACR 103 of 2005
- Appellant
AND
THE QUEEN
Respondent
ON APPEAL FROM:
Jurisdiction : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Coram : YEATS DCJ
File No : IND 32 of 2004
Catchwords:
Criminal law - Content of good character direction - Whether means "otherwise" good character - Whether sentence manifestly excessive
(Page 2)
Legislation:
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), Pt IB, s 21E
Criminal Code (Cth), s 11.1(1)
Customs Act 1901 (Cth), s 233B(1)(c), s 235
Result:
Appeal against conviction dismissed
Appeal against sentence dismissed
Category: D
Representation:
Counsel:
Appellant : Mr D Grace QC
Respondent :…
Continue reading Oui v The Queen
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- Oui v The Queen [2006] WASCA 76
- Case
- [2006] WASCA 76
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Oui v The Queen, the appellant was convicted of an offence and appealed against both his conviction and the sentence imposed. The respondent was the Crown. The primary dispute revolved around the trial judge's directions to the jury regarding the appellant's good character and whether the sentence was manifestly excessive. The matter was heard in the High Court of Australia, the highest judicial forum in the nation.
The court was tasked with determining whether the trial judge's directions to the jury were correct in law and whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. The central legal issue was the interpretation of the term "otherwise" in the context of the direction on good character and whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. This required the court to consider the appropriate standard of review and the implications of the trial judge's directions on the jury's decision-making process.
The court found that the trial judge's directions were not erroneous and that the jury was properly instructed on the concept of good character. The court also held that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive, taking into account all relevant factors. The court emphasised the importance of allowing the trial judge discretion in sentencing and found no basis to interfere with the sentence imposed. Consequently, the appeal against both the conviction and the sentence was dismissed.
The court's final orders were that the appeal against the conviction be dismissed and that the appeal against the sentence be dismissed. The decision reaffirms the principles of judicial discretion in sentencing and the importance of providing accurate directions to juries in criminal trials.
The court was tasked with determining whether the trial judge's directions to the jury were correct in law and whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. The central legal issue was the interpretation of the term "otherwise" in the context of the direction on good character and whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. This required the court to consider the appropriate standard of review and the implications of the trial judge's directions on the jury's decision-making process.
The court found that the trial judge's directions were not erroneous and that the jury was properly instructed on the concept of good character. The court also held that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive, taking into account all relevant factors. The court emphasised the importance of allowing the trial judge discretion in sentencing and found no basis to interfere with the sentence imposed. Consequently, the appeal against both the conviction and the sentence was dismissed.
The court's final orders were that the appeal against the conviction be dismissed and that the appeal against the sentence be dismissed. The decision reaffirms the principles of judicial discretion in sentencing and the importance of providing accurate directions to juries in criminal trials.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal against conviction dismissed
Appeal against sentence dismissed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.