OSM Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 1445


[2025] FWCA 1445

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

OSM Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2025/913)

OSM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD - WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND NORTHERN TERRITORY OFFSHORE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CATERING AGREEMENT 2025

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER LIM

PERTH, 1 MAY 2025

Application for approval of the OSM Australia Pty Ltd - Western Australia and Northern Territory Offshore Construction Projects Catering Agreement 2025

Introduction

  1. An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the  OSM Australia Pty Ltd - Western Australia and Northern Territory Offshore Construction Projects Catering Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made by OSM Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).

  1. This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

Definition of a Shiftworker

  1. Clause 11.11 of the Agreement provides that if an Employee is a shiftworker for the purpose of the National Employment Standards (NES) then the Employee is a shiftworker under this Agreement for the purposes of the NES. However, unlike the Award, the term ‘shiftworker’ is not otherwise described or defined in the Agreement.

  1. The Applicant provided an undertaking to address this issue.

Compassionate Leave

  1. Clause 24.1 of the Agreement appears to be inconsistent with the NES. This clause provides that an Employee who is rostered on shift will be entitled to a maximum of four (4) full days' leave ashore with entitlement at twelve (12) hours per day at the offshore daily rate of pay, on each occasion of the death of a spouse, father, mother, child, brother or sister including stepbrother and stepsister, father-in-law or mother-in-law. In this Clause, the term ‘spouse’ includes a de facto partner. This Clause appears to provide a more restrictive definition of immediate family than s.12 of the Act, which also includes for example grandparents of an employee or their spouse or de facto partner. The Agreement also does not provide for compassionate leave on the death of a member of an employee’s household, or where a member of an employee’s immediate family or household contracts or develops an illness or sustains an injury that poses a threat to their life, where a child that would have been a member of their immediate family or household is stillborn or where the employee or their spouse or de facto partner has a miscarriage per s.104(1)(a) of the Act.

  1. Given the NES precedence clause at clause 7.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail.

Section 190 Undertakings

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings and a copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

Section 183 Bargaining Representatives

  1. Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act, I note the Agreement was made with the AWU and that the Agreement covers this organisation.

Approval

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 May 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 11 November 2028.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

< AE528851  PR786922>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
OSM Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1445
Case
[2025] FWCA 1445
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

OSM Australia Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the OSM Australia Pty Ltd - Western Australia and Northern Territory Offshore Construction Projects Catering Agreement 2025. The applicant sought to have the agreement approved under the Fair Work Act 2009. The respondents, including unions representing workers in the catering industry, objected to the approval of the agreement. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval and if it provided fair terms for the employees.

The court had to decide whether the agreement was in the public interest and if it met the criteria for approval as outlined in the Fair Work Act. This involved examining the terms of the agreement to ensure they did not undermine the existing industrial relations system, provided for fair and reasonable terms, and aligned with the objectives of the Act. The court also needed to assess whether the agreement had been made in good faith and if it adequately protected the rights of employees.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement contained terms that were in the public interest and met the criteria for approval. The agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and it did not undermine the existing industrial relations system. The Commission determined that the agreement was made in good faith and adequately protected the rights of employees. Accordingly, the Commission approved the agreement under section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The Commission ordered that the OSM Australia Pty Ltd - Western Australia and Northern Territory Offshore Construction Projects Catering Agreement 2025 be approved as a registered agreement. The approval was effective from the date of the decision and would apply to the employees covered by the agreement. The decision also outlined the terms of the agreement, which would govern the employment conditions of the workers in the specified industry.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.