Osbourne v Byron Shire Council

Case [2010] NSWLEC 1139



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Osbourne v Byron Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 1139
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
D Osbourne

RESPONDENT
Byron Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10022 of 2010
CORAM: Moore SC
KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :-
DATES OF HEARING: 4 May 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 4 May 2010
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Mr M Young, solicitor
McCartney Young

RESPONDENT
Ms P Hudson, solicitor
Marsdens Law Group

JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      MOORE SC

      4 May 2010

      10/10022 Osbourne v Byron Shire Council

      JUDGMENT

      This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.

1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: In these proceedings, relating to a dwelling to be altered and given additions at New Brighton, somewhat to the north of Byron in Byron Shire Council's (the council) area, all of the issues have been resolved by agreement between the parties. As to the issue of the concurrence of the Director-General of the Department of Planning (the Department), a concurrence that had previously been withheld, I am now satisfied, as a consequence of an e-mail from the Team Leader (Local Planning) of the northern region of the Department, dated 30 April 2010, to the applicant's solicitor, that this provides the necessary indication that the Director-General's concurrence is now granted on the basis of the restrictions that are proposed and that are discussed in the joint report that forms Exhibit 2 in the proceedings.

2 There were, as I noted when I read the council's documents that had been filed in the proceedings, no objections to the proposed development. As a consequence, there is no basis upon which I could decline to make the consent orders that are now proposed and the orders of the court reflect, therefore, the proposed consent orders.

3 The Court orders, by consent, that:


      1. The Appeal is upheld; and
      2. Development Application DA10.2008.7001 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house on the land at 14 Gaggin Street, New Brighton, is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure “A”.

Senior Commissioner

Details
AGLC
Osbourne v Byron Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 1139
Case
[2010] NSWLEC 1139
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales heard a case involving Osbourne, the applicant, and Byron Shire Council, the respondent. The case pertained to a proposed alteration and addition to a dwelling in New Brighton, north of Byron, within the Byron Shire Council's area. The primary issue before the court was the approval of a development application, specifically DA10.2008.7001, for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling on 14 Gaggin Street, New Brighton. The court needed to decide whether the development application should be approved, given that the Director-General of the Department of Planning had initially withheld concurrence but later indicated approval through an email from the Team Leader (Local Planning) of the northern region of the Department.

The court found that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues, including the concurrence from the Director-General, which was confirmed through an email dated 30 April 2010. There were no objections to the proposed development from any party. The court, therefore, had no basis to decline the proposed consent orders, which were reflected in the court's orders. The court approved the development application on the condition that it adheres to the conditions outlined in Annexure "A".

In summary, the court granted the consent orders, approving the development application for the proposed alterations and additions to the dwelling, subject to the specified conditions. This decision effectively resolved the dispute between the applicant and the council, facilitating the proposed development while ensuring compliance with the necessary conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.