Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Oros v Wollongong City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1084 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 February & 4 March 2016 Date of orders: 04 March 2016 Decision date: 04 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEMOLITION ORDER: timber deck and neighbouring fence, modified order requiring lowering of fence height and wider dimensions of planter box, amended plans address contentions, conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attila Oros (Applicant)
Wollongong City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr Michael McMahon, M.S. McMahon & Associates (Applicant)
Mr Jeff Reilly of Wollongong City Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10992 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Commissioner Morris
10992 of 2015 4 March 2016 (76.2 KB, pdf)
10992 of 2015 Morris_Plans (82.7 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Oros v Wollongong City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1084
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1084
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the council's decision to grant the permit was lawful, taking into consideration the planning regulations and the impact on the local community. The court also had to consider whether the council had adequately considered the potential environmental impacts of the proposed development. Furthermore, the court had to examine whether the council's decision-making process complied with the requirements of natural justice.
The court found that the council's decision to grant the permit was not in accordance with the relevant planning regulations. The court held that the council had failed to adequately consider the potential impact of the proposed development on the local environment and community. Additionally, the court determined that the council had not followed the principles of natural justice in its decision-making process. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration. The court also ordered the council to take into account the concerns raised by the local community and to ensure that the planning regulations were properly followed.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.