| [2018] FWCA 3029 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Origin Energy Limited
(AG2018/690)
ORIGIN ENERGY (LPG SOMERTON) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Road transport industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 28 MAY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Origin Energy (LPG Somerton) Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Origin Energy (LPG Somerton) Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Origin Energy Limited. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 28 May 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 June 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 26 November 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428536 PR607505>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Origin Energy Limited [2018] FWCA 3029
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3029
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the enterprise agreement was made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, whether it was made in good faith, and whether it provided appropriate redundancy entitlements. The dismissed employees argued that the agreement did not meet these criteria and that its approval would contravene the principles of procedural fairness and good faith bargaining.
In determining the application, the Commission considered the process through which the agreement was made, the nature of the changes to the employees' conditions, and the provisions of the agreement itself. The Commission found that the agreement had been made in good faith and that it complied with the relevant statutory provisions. The Commission also concluded that the redundancy entitlements provided by the agreement were appropriate and that its approval would not contravene the principles of procedural fairness. Accordingly, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was granted. The Commission made orders approving the agreement and directing its registration.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.