FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ORBACH & SCHRODER | [2014] FCCA 3056 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Practice and procedure – change of venue – consideration of rules 8.01 and 8.02 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975, ss.60B, 60CA, 62G, 68L International Convention on the Rights of the Child |
| H & W (1995) FLC 92-598 Re R Children’s Wishes [2000] FamCA 43 AMS & AIF (1999) CLR 160 |
| Applicant: | MS ORBACH |
| Respondent: | MR SCHRODER |
| File Number: | CAC 1077 of 2009 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Harman |
| Hearing date: | 10 December 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 10 December 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Albury |
| Delivered on: | 10 December 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Ms Murrell of Farrell Lusher Solicitors |
| The Respondent appeared in person. |
ORDERS
Vacate the hearing 30 September 2015 (being a hearing of the Contravention Applications filed 28 September 2013, 13 February 2014, 1 September 2014 and 24 September 2014).
Pursuant to s.68L an Independent Children’s Lawyer is appointed for the reasons and with ancillary orders as set out in the usual form of order Exhibit A hereto.
Transfer these proceeding and all extant Applications (comprising the above Contravention Applications together with the Initiating Application filed 1 December 2014) to the Newcastle Registry of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
List the proceedings for mention 9.30am 3 February 2015.
Order the Reasons delivered today, to be forwarded with the file to assist the Federal Circuit Court Judge upon whose docket the matter will ultimately reside.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Orbach & Schroder is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Exhibit A
Appointment of an Independent Children’s Lawyer
Pursuant to s.68L of the Family Law Act 1975 an Independent Children’s Lawyer shall be appointed to represent the interests of the child the subject of these proceedings; X born (omitted) 1999.
The Legal Aid Commission of NSW is requested to make arrangements as soon as practicable to facilitate the above order,
Each of the parties shall within seven (7) days of any request complete and provide to the Independent Children’s Lawyer a parenting questionnaire and/or such other information as may be requested.
Each of the parties shall within seven (7) days (or forthwith upon filing) forward to the Legal Aid Commission (Sydney Office) copies of all any documents filed by them in these proceedings together with:
(a)Any medical reports they hold relating to the child;
(b)Any psychological or school counsellor or pre-school intervention reports they hold relating to the child;
(c)Any school reports they hold for the child;
(d)Any other documents they hold and wish the Independents Children’s Lawyer to see and/or that they intend to seek to tender to the Court or rely on in these proceedings.
Each of the parties shall present the child to such places and at such times and dates as are requested…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Orbach and Schroder and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FCCA 3056
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate course of action for the proceedings, including whether to appoint an Independent Children’s Lawyer, and where the proceedings should be heard. The court also needed to consider the transfer of the matter to a different registry.
Judge Harman ordered that the hearing scheduled for 30 September 2015 be vacated. Pursuant to section 68L of the relevant legislation, an Independent Children’s Lawyer was appointed, with the specific reasons and ancillary orders detailed in Exhibit A. Furthermore, the court ordered the transfer of the proceedings and all extant applications to the Newcastle Registry of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The matter was then listed for mention on 3 February 2015, and the reasons for today's decision were to be forwarded to the Federal Circuit Court to assist the judge assigned to the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Vacate the hearing 30 September 2015 (being a hearing of the Contravention Applications filed 28 September 2013, 13 February 2014, 1 September 2014 and 24 September 2014).
2.
Pursuant to s.68L an Independent Children’s Lawyer is appointed for the reasons and with ancillary orders as set out in the usual form of order Exhibit A hereto.
3.
Transfer these proceeding and all extant Applications (comprising the above Contravention Applications together with the Initiating Application filed 1 December 2014) to the Newcastle Registry of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
4.
List the proceedings for mention 9.30am 3 February 2015.
5.
Order the Reasons delivered today, to be forwarded with the file to assist the Federal Circuit Court Judge upon whose docket the matter will ultimately reside.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.