Opposition by Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application 2044878 (41) – 1Dance Africa – in the name of 1DANCE PTY LTD
Case
•
[2021] ATMO 120
•12 October 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Opposition by Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application 2044878 (41) – 1Dance Africa – in the name of 1DANCE PTY LTD [2021] ATMO 120
[2021] ATMO 120
12 October 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an opposition by Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd to the registration of trade mark application 2044878, "1Dance Africa," in the name of 1DANCE PTY LTD. The opposition was heard by Nicholas Smith, a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks.
The legal issues before the delegate were whether the grounds of opposition raised by Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd under sections 58 and 62A of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) had been established. The opponent alleged that the trade mark should not be registered because it was sought to be registered by a person other than the owner of the trade mark, and that the registration would be contrary to law.
The delegate found that the opponent had established the ground of opposition under section 58 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995*. The evidence showed that Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd and A.P.E. Events Pty Ltd had entered into a partnership agreement to jointly organise events under the name "1Dance Africa," and that under this agreement, title to and intellectual property rights in the trade mark were to be jointly owned. The delegate noted that the partnership agreement stipulated that this clause survived termination. Crucially, the applicant's director and sole shareholder was also the managing director of A.P.E. Events Pty Ltd, which had terminated the partnership agreement shortly before the applicant filed its trade mark application. As the opponent had established its ground of opposition, the delegate refused to register the trade mark. The delegate also awarded costs in favour of the opponent.
The legal issues before the delegate were whether the grounds of opposition raised by Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd under sections 58 and 62A of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) had been established. The opponent alleged that the trade mark should not be registered because it was sought to be registered by a person other than the owner of the trade mark, and that the registration would be contrary to law.
The delegate found that the opponent had established the ground of opposition under section 58 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995*. The evidence showed that Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd and A.P.E. Events Pty Ltd had entered into a partnership agreement to jointly organise events under the name "1Dance Africa," and that under this agreement, title to and intellectual property rights in the trade mark were to be jointly owned. The delegate noted that the partnership agreement stipulated that this clause survived termination. Crucially, the applicant's director and sole shareholder was also the managing director of A.P.E. Events Pty Ltd, which had terminated the partnership agreement shortly before the applicant filed its trade mark application. As the opponent had established its ground of opposition, the delegate refused to register the trade mark. The delegate also awarded costs in favour of the opponent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020