Opposition by Simon Burke to an application under section 92 of the Act by Factor Holdings Ltd to remove trade mark registration 1483535 FACTOR (11, 12) in the name of Simon Burke
Case
•
[2019] ATMO 69
•9 May 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Opposition by Simon Burke to an application under section 92 of the Act by Factor Holdings Ltd to remove trade mark registration 1483535 FACTOR (11, 12) in the name of Simon Burke [2019] ATMO 69
[2019] ATMO 69
9 May 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an opposition by Simon Burke to an application by Factor Holdings Ltd to remove trade mark registration number 1483535, for the mark FACTOR (in classes 11 and 12), from the Register of Trade Marks. The opposition was heard by Katrina Brown.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant, Factor Holdings Ltd, had established grounds for the removal of the trade mark registration under section 92 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth). Specifically, the Court was required to determine if the trade mark had been genuinely used in Australia in relation to the goods for which it was registered, or if there was a proper intention to use the mark.
The Court considered evidence presented by both parties regarding the use of the FACTOR trade mark. It applied the principles established in case law concerning the requirements for genuine use and the assessment of an intention to use a trade mark. The Court found that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate genuine use of the trade mark in Australia for the goods in classes 11 and 12, nor did it establish a proper intention to use the mark.
Consequently, the Court ordered the removal of trade mark registration number 1483535 from the Register of Trade Marks.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant, Factor Holdings Ltd, had established grounds for the removal of the trade mark registration under section 92 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth). Specifically, the Court was required to determine if the trade mark had been genuinely used in Australia in relation to the goods for which it was registered, or if there was a proper intention to use the mark.
The Court considered evidence presented by both parties regarding the use of the FACTOR trade mark. It applied the principles established in case law concerning the requirements for genuine use and the assessment of an intention to use a trade mark. The Court found that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate genuine use of the trade mark in Australia for the goods in classes 11 and 12, nor did it establish a proper intention to use the mark.
Consequently, the Court ordered the removal of trade mark registration number 1483535 from the Register of Trade Marks.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Ebixexchange Australia Pty Ltd v Sunrise Brokers LLP [2024] ATMO 6
Cases Citing This Decision
5
King International Pty Ltd v Eve's Sweets Pty Ltd
[2025] ATMO 67
Etoro Group Pty Ltd v ETO Gruppe Technologies GmbH
[2025] ATMO 30
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC
[2016] FCAFC 92
Austin Nicholls & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt (No 1)
[2012] FCAFC 8
E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd
[2008] FCA 1005