Opposition by Home Box Office Inc to registration of trade mark application number 1974349 (classes 29, 32, 33, 35, 41, 43) – LANNISTER with device - in the name of Hongyi Wu and Xia Yang
Case
•
[2021] ATMO 119
•11 October 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Opposition by Home Box Office Inc to registration of trade mark application number 1974349 (classes 29, 32, 33, 35, 41, 43) – LANNISTER with device - in the name of Hongyi Wu and Xia Yang [2021] ATMO 119
[2021] ATMO 119
11 October 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This decision concerns an opposition by Home Box Office Inc. to the registration of trade mark application number 1974349, for the mark LANNISTER with device, filed in the name of Hongyi Wu and Xia Yang. The opposition was heard by Katrina Brown.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicants, Hongyi Wu and Xia Yang, were the "owner" of the trade mark within the meaning of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) at the time of filing the application. The opposition was brought under section 52 of the Act, with section 58 being a key consideration.
The Court found that the applicants were not the owners of the trade mark. Section 58 of the Act requires that an applicant for a trade mark must be the owner of the mark. As the applicants failed to establish ownership, the ground of opposition under section 58 was established. Consequently, the Court refused to register the trade mark. The Court also ordered that the applicants pay the opponent's costs according to the official scale.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicants, Hongyi Wu and Xia Yang, were the "owner" of the trade mark within the meaning of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) at the time of filing the application. The opposition was brought under section 52 of the Act, with section 58 being a key consideration.
The Court found that the applicants were not the owners of the trade mark. Section 58 of the Act requires that an applicant for a trade mark must be the owner of the mark. As the applicants failed to establish ownership, the ground of opposition under section 58 was established. Consequently, the Court refused to register the trade mark. The Court also ordered that the applicants pay the opponent's costs according to the official scale.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Opposition by Home Box Office Inc to registration of trade mark application number 2221447 (classes 32 and 33) - Lannister & Device - in the name of Lannister Group Pty Ltd [2024] ATMO 92
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Pham Global Pty Ltd v Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd
[2017] FCAFC 83
Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Ltd
[2018] FCAFC 6