Opposition by Henkel AG & Co. KGaA to registration of trade mark application numbers 2238310 (class 3) –
Case
•
[2025] ATMO 198
•19 September 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Opposition by Henkel AG & Co. KGaA to registration of trade mark application numbers 2238310 (class 3) – [2025] ATMO 198
[2025] ATMO 198
19 September 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (the Opponent) opposed the registration of trade mark application numbers 2238310 and 2238311 (the Claimed Marks) in Class 3. The decision was made by the Registrar of Trade Marks, who was required to determine whether to refuse or register the trade marks, considering the grounds of opposition raised by the Opponent.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether the Opponent had established any of the grounds on which the applications were opposed, specifically under section 41 of the relevant legislation. This section pertains to the registrability of trade marks based on their inherent distinctiveness or acquired distinctiveness.
The Registrar found that the Opponent had successfully established the ground of opposition under section 41 in respect of both Claimed Marks. Consequently, the Registrar decided to refuse the registration of trade marks 2238310 and 2238311. The Registrar also awarded costs against the Applicant, noting that costs typically follow the event, and referencing a previous decision for the manner of awarding costs.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether the Opponent had established any of the grounds on which the applications were opposed, specifically under section 41 of the relevant legislation. This section pertains to the registrability of trade marks based on their inherent distinctiveness or acquired distinctiveness.
The Registrar found that the Opponent had successfully established the ground of opposition under section 41 in respect of both Claimed Marks. Consequently, the Registrar decided to refuse the registration of trade marks 2238310 and 2238311. The Registrar also awarded costs against the Applicant, noting that costs typically follow the event, and referencing a previous decision for the manner of awarding costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks
[1964] HCA 55