Opposition by Hatton Holdings (Vic) Pty Ltd as trustee for the Hatton Holdings (Vic) Trust to registration of trade mark application number 1906670 (Classes 29, 30, 35, 41, 43) – ZAATAR w ZEIT with device in the...
Case
•
[2022] ATMO 28
•27 February 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Opposition by Hatton Holdings (Vic) Pty Ltd as trustee for the Hatton Holdings (Vic) Trust to registration of trade mark application number 1906670 (Classes 29, 30, 35, 41, 43) – ZAATAR w ZEIT with device in the... [2022] ATMO 28
[2022] ATMO 28
27 February 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Hatton Holdings (Vic) Pty Ltd, as trustee for the Hatton Holdings (Vic) Trust, opposed the registration of the trade mark application ZAATAR w ZEIT with device in Classes 29, 30, 35, 41, and 43. The opposition was heard by Blake Knowles, Hearing Officer, acting as Delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks. The Opponent sought to prevent the registration of the Applicant's trade mark.
The legal issues before the Hearing Officer were whether the grounds of opposition under sections 42(b), 44, and 60 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) were established. The Opponent bore the burden of proving these grounds on the balance of probabilities, with rights assessed as at the relevant date. The Opponent relied on its registered trade mark (number 1511172) for pizza and restaurants/cafes, and its unregistered use of the name 'Zaatar Middle Eastern Food' and associated marks in connection with its restaurant business.
The Hearing Officer found that none of the grounds of opposition were established. The evidence did not demonstrate that the Opponent had established the necessary grounds under sections 42(b), 44, or 60 of the Act. Consequently, the Hearing Officer decided that the trade mark application should proceed to registration. The Applicant was awarded costs against the Opponent.
The legal issues before the Hearing Officer were whether the grounds of opposition under sections 42(b), 44, and 60 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth) were established. The Opponent bore the burden of proving these grounds on the balance of probabilities, with rights assessed as at the relevant date. The Opponent relied on its registered trade mark (number 1511172) for pizza and restaurants/cafes, and its unregistered use of the name 'Zaatar Middle Eastern Food' and associated marks in connection with its restaurant business.
The Hearing Officer found that none of the grounds of opposition were established. The evidence did not demonstrate that the Opponent had established the necessary grounds under sections 42(b), 44, or 60 of the Act. Consequently, the Hearing Officer decided that the trade mark application should proceed to registration. The Applicant was awarded costs against the Opponent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 100
Cases Citing This Decision
17
Opposition by Local Kitchen Co Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application numbers 2367277 (classes 29 and 30) –
[2025] ATMO 149
Opposition by Local Kitchen Co Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application numbers 2367277 (classes 29 and 30) –
[2025] ATMO 149
Latin Deli Pty Ltd v Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V
[2023] ATMO 149
Cases Cited
17
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020